Summary of Bifurcation Stenting Strategies and Outcomes in Women

M. Alasnag, Z. Dakhil, I. Sukmawati, Sarita Rao, Shazia T. Hussain
{"title":"Summary of Bifurcation Stenting Strategies and Outcomes in Women","authors":"M. Alasnag, Z. Dakhil, I. Sukmawati, Sarita Rao, Shazia T. Hussain","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1748979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have examined the efficacy of drug-eluting stents in acute and chronic coronary syndromes and demonstrated benefit in both men and women. However, the effect of gender on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in more complex disease including bifurcation disease is less well-known. In particular, a two-stent or provisional strategy, for both left Main and non-Left Main bifurcation lesions, has been variable across the different studies. In addition, there is a notable geographic preference whereby a stepwise provisional strategy with culotte as a bailout technique is preferred in Europe while in Asia there is a predilection to DK Crush for a 2-stent strategy. Many of these trials, however, are underpowered to conduct subgroup analysis for outcomes in women. To date, the evidence suggests women have better outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting in complex disease. The higher events in women undergoing PCI are largely driven by bleeding. Studies dedicated to evaluating outcomes after complex revascularization in women are desperately needed with long-term follow-up. This review examines the current landmark trials as they pertain to outcomes in women.","PeriodicalId":92905,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of cardiovascular disease in women WINCARS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have examined the efficacy of drug-eluting stents in acute and chronic coronary syndromes and demonstrated benefit in both men and women. However, the effect of gender on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes in more complex disease including bifurcation disease is less well-known. In particular, a two-stent or provisional strategy, for both left Main and non-Left Main bifurcation lesions, has been variable across the different studies. In addition, there is a notable geographic preference whereby a stepwise provisional strategy with culotte as a bailout technique is preferred in Europe while in Asia there is a predilection to DK Crush for a 2-stent strategy. Many of these trials, however, are underpowered to conduct subgroup analysis for outcomes in women. To date, the evidence suggests women have better outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting in complex disease. The higher events in women undergoing PCI are largely driven by bleeding. Studies dedicated to evaluating outcomes after complex revascularization in women are desperately needed with long-term follow-up. This review examines the current landmark trials as they pertain to outcomes in women.
女性分叉支架术策略和结果综述
一些研究检查了药物洗脱支架在急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征中的疗效,并证明对男性和女性都有益处。然而,性别对包括分叉疾病在内的更复杂疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果的影响尚不为人所知。特别是,对于左主干和非左主干分叉病变,双支架或临时策略在不同的研究中有所不同。此外,还有一个显著的地理偏好,即在欧洲首选以套索作为救助技术的逐步临时策略,而在亚洲则倾向于DK Crush作为2支架策略。然而,这些试验中的许多都不足以对女性的结果进行亚组分析。迄今为止,有证据表明,在复杂疾病中,女性冠状动脉旁路移植术的效果更好。在接受PCI的妇女中,较高的事件主要是由出血引起的。女性复杂血运重建术后的预后评估研究迫切需要长期随访。本综述审查了目前具有里程碑意义的试验,因为它们与妇女的结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信