ALKALI ACTIVATED FLY ASH BASED CONCRETE: EVALUATION OF CURING PROCESS USING NON-LINEAR ULTRASONIC APPROACH

IF 2 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arash Nikvar-Hassani, Hamad N. Alnuaimi, U. Amjad, S. Sasmal, Lianyang Zhang, T. Kundu
{"title":"ALKALI ACTIVATED FLY ASH BASED CONCRETE: EVALUATION OF CURING PROCESS USING NON-LINEAR ULTRASONIC APPROACH","authors":"Arash Nikvar-Hassani, Hamad N. Alnuaimi, U. Amjad, S. Sasmal, Lianyang Zhang, T. Kundu","doi":"10.1115/1.4052952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates the applicability of nondestructive testing and evaluation (NDT&E) method using ultrasonic signals to monitor the curing of alkali activated fly ash based concrete (AAFC). The evaluation was carried out on AAFC specimens with two different water/binder (W/B) ratios of 0.3 and 0.5 and after curing at 60 °C for 7, 14 and 28 days, respectively. The signals are recorded and analyzed using linear and non-linear ultrasonic techniques. The results show that the non-linear ultrasonic technique has a clear advantage over the linear ultrasonic technique when monitoring the curing of AAFC specimens with the lower W/B ratio. However, the specimens with the higher W/B ratio do not undergo proper curing and therefore do not show clear distinctions between the curing times measured from the two ultrasonic techniques. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the AAFC specimens at different W/B ratios and curing times is also measured. The UCS results showed a good correlation with the ultrasonic results.","PeriodicalId":52294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper investigates the applicability of nondestructive testing and evaluation (NDT&E) method using ultrasonic signals to monitor the curing of alkali activated fly ash based concrete (AAFC). The evaluation was carried out on AAFC specimens with two different water/binder (W/B) ratios of 0.3 and 0.5 and after curing at 60 °C for 7, 14 and 28 days, respectively. The signals are recorded and analyzed using linear and non-linear ultrasonic techniques. The results show that the non-linear ultrasonic technique has a clear advantage over the linear ultrasonic technique when monitoring the curing of AAFC specimens with the lower W/B ratio. However, the specimens with the higher W/B ratio do not undergo proper curing and therefore do not show clear distinctions between the curing times measured from the two ultrasonic techniques. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the AAFC specimens at different W/B ratios and curing times is also measured. The UCS results showed a good correlation with the ultrasonic results.
碱活化粉煤灰基混凝土:用非线性超声法评价养护过程
研究了超声波无损检测与评价方法在碱活化粉煤灰基混凝土养护过程中的适用性。对水胶比(W/B)分别为0.3和0.5、60℃固化7、14和28天后的AAFC试件进行评价。使用线性和非线性超声技术记录和分析信号。结果表明,在监测低W/B的AAFC试件的固化过程时,非线性超声技术明显优于线性超声技术。然而,具有较高W/B比的试样没有经过适当的固化,因此两种超声技术测量的固化时间之间没有明显的区别。测定了不同W/B比和养护时间下AAFC试样的无侧限抗压强度(UCS)。超声结果与超声结果具有良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信