The Advantages and Disadvantages of Livestock Manure and its Biochar as a Solid Fuel and Soil Amendment

Made Gunamantha, I. P. Parwata, I. G. A. B. Widana, M. V. Oviantari
{"title":"The Advantages and Disadvantages of Livestock Manure and its Biochar as a Solid Fuel and Soil Amendment","authors":"Made Gunamantha, I. P. Parwata, I. G. A. B. Widana, M. V. Oviantari","doi":"10.26554/ijems.2022.6.4.119-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to elucidate some of the basic characteristics of manure and its biochar and to explore its potential as a solid fuel and soil amendment. Cow, pig, chicken, and duck manure were selected and collected in the farmer’s pen. Furthermore, composite sampling was applied to obtain a representative sample of each manure. Each of them was dried in the sun for four to seven days, and each sample was divided into two parts. The first part was not further processed, while the rest were carbonized. Carbonization was carried out within a temperature range of 300 to 400?C and 4 h residence time. C-organic, N-total, available P and K, CEC, volatile matters, fixed carbon, ash content, Carbon (C), Hydrogen (H), Oxygen (O), Nitrogen (N), Sulfur (S) content), higher heating value, and the chemical composition of their ash in both original and carbonized manure were identified. In addition, the nutritional content was relatively comparable and the H/C and O/C ratio in biochar were lower than in its original state. Both the original and carbonized manure indicated low calorific value, while the ash content and fouling index were high. The results showed that livestock manure in both forms has more potential as a soil amendment than solid fuel.","PeriodicalId":32450,"journal":{"name":"IJEMS Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJEMS Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26554/ijems.2022.6.4.119-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate some of the basic characteristics of manure and its biochar and to explore its potential as a solid fuel and soil amendment. Cow, pig, chicken, and duck manure were selected and collected in the farmer’s pen. Furthermore, composite sampling was applied to obtain a representative sample of each manure. Each of them was dried in the sun for four to seven days, and each sample was divided into two parts. The first part was not further processed, while the rest were carbonized. Carbonization was carried out within a temperature range of 300 to 400?C and 4 h residence time. C-organic, N-total, available P and K, CEC, volatile matters, fixed carbon, ash content, Carbon (C), Hydrogen (H), Oxygen (O), Nitrogen (N), Sulfur (S) content), higher heating value, and the chemical composition of their ash in both original and carbonized manure were identified. In addition, the nutritional content was relatively comparable and the H/C and O/C ratio in biochar were lower than in its original state. Both the original and carbonized manure indicated low calorific value, while the ash content and fouling index were high. The results showed that livestock manure in both forms has more potential as a soil amendment than solid fuel.
畜禽粪便及其生物炭作为固体燃料和土壤改良剂的优缺点
本研究的目的是阐明粪便及其生物炭的一些基本特性,并探讨其作为固体燃料和土壤改良剂的潜力。牛、猪、鸡和鸭的粪便被挑选出来并收集在农民的猪圈里。此外,采用复合采样方法获得每种粪便的代表性样品。每个样品在太阳下晒干4到7天,每个样品被分成两部分。第一部分未进一步加工,其余部分碳化。碳化在300 - 400℃的温度范围内进行。C和4小时停留时间。鉴定了原始和炭化粪肥中碳有机、全氮、速效磷和速效钾、CEC、挥发物、固定碳、灰分、碳(C)、氢(H)、氧(O)、氮(N)、硫(S)含量、较高的热值及其灰分的化学组成。此外,生物炭的营养成分具有相对可比性,其H/C和O/C比低于其原始状态。原肥和炭化肥热值均较低,灰分和结垢指数较高。结果表明,两种形式的畜禽粪便都比固体燃料具有更大的土壤改良剂潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书