Border and im/mobility entanglements in the Mediterranean: Introduction to the special issue

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Beste İşleyen, Nora El Qadim
{"title":"Border and im/mobility entanglements in the Mediterranean: Introduction to the special issue","authors":"Beste İşleyen, Nora El Qadim","doi":"10.1177/02637758231157264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The material violence of borders and border control has turned the Mediterranean Sea into a ‘border spectacle’ (De Genova, 2002) – a nodal spectacularized meeting point between the North and the South; EUrope and ‘non-EUrope’ (Cuttitta, 2018; van Reekum, 2019). Advanced technologies of surveillance, calculation, communication, coordination and inter-ception (e.g. Andersson, 2012; Follis, 2017; _ Is¸leyen, 2021; Pallister-Wilkins, 2017; Stierl, 2021), empowered by narratives of ‘crisis’ and ‘emergency’ (Jeandesboz and Pallister-Wilkins, 2016), statistics (e.g. Tazzioli, 2015; van Reekum, 2019), mediatic images (Ibrahim, 2018) and cartography (Cobarrubias, 2019), have contributed to the construction of understandings of the Mediterranean as a site of violence, death, and disappearance, rather than of circulation. Furthermore, these narratives and images rely on racialized oppositions (Mainwaring and DeBono, 2021) which draw and redraw the Mediterranean as a demarcation separating EUrope from its ‘Others.’ In contrast to these dominant perceptions of the Mediterranean as a borderzone constituted by EUrope and policed in cooperation with a co-opted (or enlisted) “South”, 1 a plethora of academic work has shown that the Mediterranean has historically been shaped by multiple forms of connectivity.","PeriodicalId":48303,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","volume":"71 1","pages":"3 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning D-Society & Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758231157264","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The material violence of borders and border control has turned the Mediterranean Sea into a ‘border spectacle’ (De Genova, 2002) – a nodal spectacularized meeting point between the North and the South; EUrope and ‘non-EUrope’ (Cuttitta, 2018; van Reekum, 2019). Advanced technologies of surveillance, calculation, communication, coordination and inter-ception (e.g. Andersson, 2012; Follis, 2017; _ Is¸leyen, 2021; Pallister-Wilkins, 2017; Stierl, 2021), empowered by narratives of ‘crisis’ and ‘emergency’ (Jeandesboz and Pallister-Wilkins, 2016), statistics (e.g. Tazzioli, 2015; van Reekum, 2019), mediatic images (Ibrahim, 2018) and cartography (Cobarrubias, 2019), have contributed to the construction of understandings of the Mediterranean as a site of violence, death, and disappearance, rather than of circulation. Furthermore, these narratives and images rely on racialized oppositions (Mainwaring and DeBono, 2021) which draw and redraw the Mediterranean as a demarcation separating EUrope from its ‘Others.’ In contrast to these dominant perceptions of the Mediterranean as a borderzone constituted by EUrope and policed in cooperation with a co-opted (or enlisted) “South”, 1 a plethora of academic work has shown that the Mediterranean has historically been shaped by multiple forms of connectivity.
地中海的边界和流动问题:特刊导论
边境和边境控制的物质暴力已经把地中海变成了一个“边境奇观”(De Genova, 2002)——一个北方和南方之间壮观的节点交汇点;欧洲和“非欧洲”(Cuttitta, 2018;van Reekum, 2019)。先进的监视、计算、通信、协调和拦截技术(例如Andersson, 2012;Follis, 2017;_希勒恩,2021;Pallister-Wilkins, 2017;Stierl, 2021),通过“危机”和“紧急情况”的叙述(Jeandesboz和Pallister-Wilkins, 2016),统计数据(例如Tazzioli, 2015;van Reekum, 2019)、媒介图像(Ibrahim, 2018)和制图(Cobarrubias, 2019)有助于构建对地中海的理解,将其视为暴力、死亡和失踪的场所,而不是流通的场所。此外,这些叙事和图像依赖于种族化的对立(Mainwaring和DeBono, 2021),这些对立将地中海描绘成将欧洲与其“他者”分开的分界线。与这些主流观点相反,地中海是由欧洲构成的边界地带,并与增选(或征召)的“南方”合作进行监管,1大量的学术工作表明,地中海在历史上是由多种形式的连通性形成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: EPD: Society and Space is an international, interdisciplinary scholarly and political project. Through both a peer reviewed journal and an editor reviewed companion website, we publish articles, essays, interviews, forums, and book reviews that examine social struggles over access to and control of space, place, territory, region, and resources. We seek contributions that investigate and challenge the ways that modes and systems of power, difference and oppression differentially shape lives, and how those modes and systems are resisted, subverted and reworked. We welcome work that is empirically engaged and furthers a range of critical epistemological approaches, that pushes conceptual boundaries and puts theory to work in innovative ways, and that consciously navigates the fraught politics of knowledge production within and beyond the academy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信