“Real World†Factors Influencing Dropout from Opiate Treatment with Methadone and Buprenorphine

Bertram W. Roberts, Laura Perches, H. Sagiraju, I. Cech, J. Herbold
{"title":"“Real World†Factors Influencing Dropout from Opiate Treatment with Methadone and Buprenorphine","authors":"Bertram W. Roberts, Laura Perches, H. Sagiraju, I. Cech, J. Herbold","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: Comparison of retention in office-based, private-pay, outpatient opiate treatment programs with methadone or buprenorphine. Methods: Descriptive study with a prospective design comparing treatment retention in a licensed opiate treatment program (OTP) and buprenorphine program (BUP) offered in the same office-based setting. Over a period of 4.5 years, 1,372 patients were observed from program admission until six months or dropout, whichever was earlier. Results and conclusion: OTP had greater retention than BUP (36% vs. 15.8%); however, in both programs, retention was lower than reported elsewhere. Hispanic ethnicity, being married, and being unemployed correlate with significant dropout in OTP. Causes of early drop out in BUP were unclear. Percent of positive urine drug screens were significantly associated with drop out in both modalities. Significance: Results reflect the situation in a private pay outpatient program where patients are financially responsible for medications, transportation, and services. This, in addition to higher percentage of Hispanic ethnicity in study population and continuation of abuse of illicit substances, might explain overall low retention. Government supported treatment should improve retention in “real world” opiate dependence maintenance treatment.","PeriodicalId":14828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objective: Comparison of retention in office-based, private-pay, outpatient opiate treatment programs with methadone or buprenorphine. Methods: Descriptive study with a prospective design comparing treatment retention in a licensed opiate treatment program (OTP) and buprenorphine program (BUP) offered in the same office-based setting. Over a period of 4.5 years, 1,372 patients were observed from program admission until six months or dropout, whichever was earlier. Results and conclusion: OTP had greater retention than BUP (36% vs. 15.8%); however, in both programs, retention was lower than reported elsewhere. Hispanic ethnicity, being married, and being unemployed correlate with significant dropout in OTP. Causes of early drop out in BUP were unclear. Percent of positive urine drug screens were significantly associated with drop out in both modalities. Significance: Results reflect the situation in a private pay outpatient program where patients are financially responsible for medications, transportation, and services. This, in addition to higher percentage of Hispanic ethnicity in study population and continuation of abuse of illicit substances, might explain overall low retention. Government supported treatment should improve retention in “real world” opiate dependence maintenance treatment.
“Real Worldâ€Â影响美沙酮与丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物辍学率的因素
背景与目的:美沙酮或丁丙诺啡在办公室、私人支付、门诊阿片类药物治疗方案中的保留率比较。方法:采用前瞻性设计的描述性研究,比较在相同的办公室环境中,阿片类药物治疗方案(OTP)和丁丙诺啡方案(BUP)的治疗保留情况。在4.5年的时间里,观察了1372名患者,从项目进入到6个月或退出,以较早者为准。结果与结论:OTP的保留率高于BUP (36% vs. 15.8%);然而,在这两个项目中,保留率都低于其他地方。西班牙裔、已婚和失业与OTP中显著的辍学率相关。BUP患者早期辍学的原因尚不清楚。尿液药物筛查阳性的百分比与两种方式的退学显著相关。意义:结果反映了一个私人支付门诊项目的情况,病人在经济上负责药物、交通和服务。这一点,再加上西班牙裔在研究人群中所占比例较高,以及非法药物的持续滥用,可能解释了总体上低保留率的原因。政府支持的治疗应改善在“现实世界”阿片类药物依赖维持治疗中的滞留情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信