Factivity or Grounds? Comment on Mizrahi

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Logos and Episteme Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5840/logos-episteme201910329

H. Sankey

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note is a comment on a recent paper in this journal by Moti Mizrahi. Mizrahi claims that the factivity of knowledge entails that knowledge requires epistemic certainty. But the argument that Mizrahi presents does not proceed from factivity to certainty. Instead, it proceeds from a premise about the relationship between grounds and knowledge to the conclusion about certainty.

查看原文本刊更多论文

活动还是场地?对米兹拉希的评论

这篇笔记是对Moti Mizrahi最近发表在本杂志上的一篇论文的评论。米兹拉希声称知识的活动意味着知识需要认知的确定性。但是米兹拉希提出的论点并没有从事实走向确定性。相反，它从一个关于根据和知识之间关系的前提出发，得出关于确定性的结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Logos and Episteme Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： the journal publishes articles, reviews or discussion notes focused as well on problems concerning the general theory of knowledge, as on problems specific to the philosophy, methodology and ethics of science, philosophical logic, metaphilosophy, moral epistemology, epistemology of art, epistemology of religion, social or political epistemology, epistemology of communication. Studies in the history of science and of the philosophy of knowledge, or studies in the sociology of knowledge, cognitive psychology, and cognitive science are also welcome.