Shoreline Extraction Based on LiDAR Data Obtained Using an USV

IF 0.7 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Armin Halicki, Mariusz Specht, A. Stateczny, C. Specht, Oktawia Lewicka
{"title":"Shoreline Extraction Based on LiDAR Data Obtained Using an USV","authors":"Armin Halicki, Mariusz Specht, A. Stateczny, C. Specht, Oktawia Lewicka","doi":"10.12716/1001.17.02.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article explores the use of Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) derived point clouds to extract the shoreline of the Lake K ł odno (Poland), based on their geometry properties. The data collection was performed using the Velodyne VLP ‐ 16 laser scanner, which was mounted on the HydroDron Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV). A modified version of the shoreline extraction method proposed by Xu et al. was employed, comprising of the following steps: (1) classifying the point cloud using the Euclidean cluster extraction with a tolerance parameter of 1 m and min. cluster size of 10,000 points, (2) further filtration of boundary points by removing those with height above 1 m from the measured elevation of water surface, (3) manual determination of a curve consisting of 5 points located along the entire shoreline extraction region at a relatively constant distant from the coast, (4) removal of points that are further from the curve than the average distance, repeated twice. The method was tested on the scanned section of the lake shoreline for which Ground Control Points (GCP) were measured using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real Time Kinematic (RTK) receiver. Then, the results were compared to the ground truth data, obtaining an average position error of 2.12 m with a standard deviation of 1.11 m. The max error was 5.54 m, while the min. error was 0.41 m, all calculated on 281 extracted shoreline points. Despite the limitations of this parametric, semi ‐ supervised approach, those preliminary results demonstrate the potential for accurate shoreline extraction based on LiDAR data obtained using an USV. Further testing and optimisation of this method for larger scale and better generalisation for different waterbodies are necessary to fully assess its effectiveness and feasibility. In this context, it is essential to develop computationally efficient methods for approximating shorelines that can accurately determine their course based on a set of points.","PeriodicalId":46009,"journal":{"name":"TransNav-International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TransNav-International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.17.02.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This article explores the use of Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) derived point clouds to extract the shoreline of the Lake K ł odno (Poland), based on their geometry properties. The data collection was performed using the Velodyne VLP ‐ 16 laser scanner, which was mounted on the HydroDron Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV). A modified version of the shoreline extraction method proposed by Xu et al. was employed, comprising of the following steps: (1) classifying the point cloud using the Euclidean cluster extraction with a tolerance parameter of 1 m and min. cluster size of 10,000 points, (2) further filtration of boundary points by removing those with height above 1 m from the measured elevation of water surface, (3) manual determination of a curve consisting of 5 points located along the entire shoreline extraction region at a relatively constant distant from the coast, (4) removal of points that are further from the curve than the average distance, repeated twice. The method was tested on the scanned section of the lake shoreline for which Ground Control Points (GCP) were measured using a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Real Time Kinematic (RTK) receiver. Then, the results were compared to the ground truth data, obtaining an average position error of 2.12 m with a standard deviation of 1.11 m. The max error was 5.54 m, while the min. error was 0.41 m, all calculated on 281 extracted shoreline points. Despite the limitations of this parametric, semi ‐ supervised approach, those preliminary results demonstrate the potential for accurate shoreline extraction based on LiDAR data obtained using an USV. Further testing and optimisation of this method for larger scale and better generalisation for different waterbodies are necessary to fully assess its effectiveness and feasibility. In this context, it is essential to develop computationally efficient methods for approximating shorelines that can accurately determine their course based on a set of points.
基于USV获取的激光雷达数据的海岸线提取
本文探讨了使用光探测和测距(LiDAR)导出的点云来提取K * odno湖(波兰)的海岸线,基于它们的几何特性。数据收集使用安装在HydroDron无人水面飞行器(USV)上的Velodyne VLP‐16激光扫描仪进行。采用Xu等人提出的海岸线提取方法的改进版本,包括以下步骤:(1)采用欧几里得聚类提取对点云进行分类,误差参数为1 m,最小聚类大小为10000个点;(2)进一步过滤边界点,从测量水面高程中去除高度在1 m以上的边界点;(3)在距离海岸相对恒定的距离上,沿整个海岸线提取区域人工确定由5个点组成的曲线;(4)去除距离曲线远于平均距离的点,重复两次。该方法在使用全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)实时运动学(RTK)接收机测量地面控制点(GCP)的湖岸线扫描段上进行了测试。然后,将结果与地面真值数据进行比较,得到平均位置误差为2.12 m,标准差为1.11 m。最大误差为5.54 m,最小误差为0.41 m,均在提取的281个岸线点上计算。尽管这种参数化、半监督的方法存在局限性,但这些初步结果表明,基于USV获得的激光雷达数据,可以精确提取海岸线。为了充分评估该方法的有效性和可行性,有必要进一步对该方法进行更大规模的测试和优化,并更好地推广到不同的水体。在这种情况下,开发计算效率高的方法来近似海岸线是至关重要的,这些方法可以根据一组点准确地确定海岸线的路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信