An Internal Auditor’s Commitment to Independence: The Effect of Professional Scepticism, Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction

Nur Amira Zainal Abidin, Z. Ahmad, N. A. Hamid, Nur Afiqah Md Amin
{"title":"An Internal Auditor’s Commitment to Independence: The Effect of Professional Scepticism, Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction","authors":"Nur Amira Zainal Abidin, Z. Ahmad, N. A. Hamid, Nur Afiqah Md Amin","doi":"10.5430/afr.v12n2p39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internal auditors have found it difficult to exercise independence when management interferes with their work. This is because they are part of and work for the organisation. This study investigated the relationships between professional scepticism, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and commitment to independence. Data were collected using questionnaires. 77 out of 325 questionnaires were returned from heads of in-house internal auditors of Malaysian listed companies. Multiple regression analysis was utilised to determine the link between the independent and dependent variables. After testing the three hypotheses, the findings indicate that professional scepticism and self-efficacy significantly impact commitment to independence, whereas job satisfaction has no significant impact on them. These associations suggested that the internal auditor is more committed to independence when professional scepticism and self-efficacy are higher. By demonstrating the link between professional scepticism, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and Malaysian internal auditors' commitment to independence, this study considerably adds to the body of knowledge on internal auditing and management.","PeriodicalId":34570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v12n2p39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal auditors have found it difficult to exercise independence when management interferes with their work. This is because they are part of and work for the organisation. This study investigated the relationships between professional scepticism, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and commitment to independence. Data were collected using questionnaires. 77 out of 325 questionnaires were returned from heads of in-house internal auditors of Malaysian listed companies. Multiple regression analysis was utilised to determine the link between the independent and dependent variables. After testing the three hypotheses, the findings indicate that professional scepticism and self-efficacy significantly impact commitment to independence, whereas job satisfaction has no significant impact on them. These associations suggested that the internal auditor is more committed to independence when professional scepticism and self-efficacy are higher. By demonstrating the link between professional scepticism, self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and Malaysian internal auditors' commitment to independence, this study considerably adds to the body of knowledge on internal auditing and management.
内部审计师对独立性的承诺:职业怀疑、自我效能和工作满意度的影响
内部审计师发现,当管理层干预他们的工作时,他们很难行使独立性。这是因为他们是组织的一部分,并为组织工作。本研究考察了职业怀疑主义、自我效能感、工作满意度和独立承诺之间的关系。通过问卷调查收集数据。在325份问卷中,有77份来自马来西亚上市公司的内部审计师。采用多元回归分析来确定自变量和因变量之间的联系。通过对三个假设的检验,发现职业怀疑主义和自我效能感对独立承诺有显著影响,而工作满意度对独立承诺没有显著影响。这些关联表明,当专业怀疑和自我效能较高时,内部审计师更致力于独立性。通过展示专业怀疑、自我效能、工作满意度和马来西亚内部审计师对独立性的承诺之间的联系,本研究大大增加了内部审计和管理的知识体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信