The relationship between irrational relationship beliefs and conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood

Marija Aušraitė, K. Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė
{"title":"The relationship between irrational relationship beliefs and conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood","authors":"Marija Aušraitė, K. Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė","doi":"10.7220/2345-024x.23.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Maintaining romantic relationships is one of the most important developmental tasks in young adulthood. Lower relationship satisfaction is associated with more expressed irrational relationship beliefs (Janjani, Momeni, Rai, & Saidi, 2017). According to the Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, irrational beliefs should cause maladaptive behavior in conflicts. However, it is not clear how particular irrational relationship beliefs are associated with specific conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. Purpose. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the link between irrational relationship beliefs and conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. Method. 148 young adults (110 female, 38 male) having romantic relationships participated in this study. The irrational relationship beliefs were assessed with a questionnaire by R. J. Eidelson and N. Epstein (1982). Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory – II (Rahim & Magner, 1995) was used to measure conflict resolution strategies. Results: The results showed that the more expressed irrational belief “Disagreement is destructive” was related to higher use of dominating and avoiding and lower use of integrating and compromising conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. The more expressed irrational belief “Partners cannot change” was associated with lower use of integrating and compromising conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. No links between the irrational belief “Partners cannot change” and avoiding conflict resolution strategy were found in young adulthood. The more expressed irrational belief “The sexes are different” was associated with higher use of dominating conflict resolution strategy in young adulthood. The more expressed irrational belief “Sexual perfectionism” was related to lower use of integrating conflict resolution strategy in young adulthood. Conclusions. Results of this study partially support Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. 1 Address for correspondence: Kristina Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, Vytautas Magnus University, Department of Psychology. Address: Jonavos g. 66-328, LT-44191, Kaunas, Lithuania. kristina.zardeckaite-matulaitiene@vdu.lt","PeriodicalId":31986,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology A Biopsychosocial Approach","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology A Biopsychosocial Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7220/2345-024x.23.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maintaining romantic relationships is one of the most important developmental tasks in young adulthood. Lower relationship satisfaction is associated with more expressed irrational relationship beliefs (Janjani, Momeni, Rai, & Saidi, 2017). According to the Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy, irrational beliefs should cause maladaptive behavior in conflicts. However, it is not clear how particular irrational relationship beliefs are associated with specific conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. Purpose. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the link between irrational relationship beliefs and conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. Method. 148 young adults (110 female, 38 male) having romantic relationships participated in this study. The irrational relationship beliefs were assessed with a questionnaire by R. J. Eidelson and N. Epstein (1982). Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory – II (Rahim & Magner, 1995) was used to measure conflict resolution strategies. Results: The results showed that the more expressed irrational belief “Disagreement is destructive” was related to higher use of dominating and avoiding and lower use of integrating and compromising conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. The more expressed irrational belief “Partners cannot change” was associated with lower use of integrating and compromising conflict resolution strategies in young adulthood. No links between the irrational belief “Partners cannot change” and avoiding conflict resolution strategy were found in young adulthood. The more expressed irrational belief “The sexes are different” was associated with higher use of dominating conflict resolution strategy in young adulthood. The more expressed irrational belief “Sexual perfectionism” was related to lower use of integrating conflict resolution strategy in young adulthood. Conclusions. Results of this study partially support Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy. 1 Address for correspondence: Kristina Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, Vytautas Magnus University, Department of Psychology. Address: Jonavos g. 66-328, LT-44191, Kaunas, Lithuania. kristina.zardeckaite-matulaitiene@vdu.lt
青少年非理性关系信念与冲突解决策略的关系
背景:维持浪漫关系是成年早期最重要的发展任务之一。较低的关系满意度与更多表达的非理性关系信念相关(Janjani, Momeni, Rai, & Saidi, 2017)。理性情绪行为疗法认为,不合理的信念会导致冲突中的适应不良行为。然而,目前尚不清楚特定的非理性关系信念是如何与青年期特定的冲突解决策略相关联的。目的。本研究的目的是评估非理性关系信念与青年期冲突解决策略之间的联系。方法:148名有恋爱关系的年轻人(女性110人,男性38人)参与了这项研究。R. J. Eidelson和N. Epstein(1982)用问卷对非理性关系信念进行了评估。Rahim组织冲突量表II (Rahim & Magner, 1995)被用来衡量冲突解决策略。结果:结果表明,“分歧是破坏性的”这一非理性信念在青年成人中表达得越多,支配性和回避性冲突解决策略的使用越多,整合性和妥协性冲突解决策略的使用越少。“伴侣不能改变”这一非理性信念的表达越多,在成年早期,整合和妥协冲突解决策略的使用就越少。“伴侣不能改变”的非理性信念与避免冲突解决策略之间没有联系。在成年早期,“两性不同”这种非理性信念的表达越多,就越容易使用支配性冲突解决策略。“性完美主义”这一非理性信念的表达与青年期整合冲突解决策略的低使用率有关。结论。本研究结果部分支持理性情绪行为疗法。1通信地址:Kristina Žardeckaitė-Matulaitienė, Vytautas Magnus大学,心理学系。地址:立陶宛考纳斯约纳沃斯66-328,LT-44191。kristina.zardeckaite-matulaitiene@vdu.lt
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信