DARI KRITIS KE TINDAKAN KOMUNIKATIF

M. Ied Al Munir
{"title":"DARI KRITIS KE TINDAKAN KOMUNIKATIF","authors":"M. Ied Al Munir","doi":"10.24239/rsy.v19i1.1320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action is important to respond to modernity, rationality, and capitalism. This theory departs from the refinement of the Critical Theory stagnation promoted by the Frankfurt School's first generation with the characters Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse. Therefore, this study aims to describe the efforts that have been made by Habermas, both to find the cause of the stagnation of the Critical Theory and to improve it. This research is qualitative research with a literature background so data collection is done by reading the works of Habermas and other related works. Data analysis of the collected data was carried out using historical and interpretation methods. This study found that the Critical Theory proposed by Horkheimer, Adorno, and Marcuse stagnated because they interpreted rationality as instrumental rationality. Meanwhile, Habermas’s refinement of Critical Theory led to the formation of the Critical Theory in a modified form, namely the Theory of Communicative Action. In this case, Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action provides a solution in the form of additional elements of communication for the Critical Theory and sees rationality as communicative rationality that allows interaction between subjects in social life.","PeriodicalId":31634,"journal":{"name":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fikrah Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah dan Studi Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24239/rsy.v19i1.1320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action is important to respond to modernity, rationality, and capitalism. This theory departs from the refinement of the Critical Theory stagnation promoted by the Frankfurt School's first generation with the characters Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse. Therefore, this study aims to describe the efforts that have been made by Habermas, both to find the cause of the stagnation of the Critical Theory and to improve it. This research is qualitative research with a literature background so data collection is done by reading the works of Habermas and other related works. Data analysis of the collected data was carried out using historical and interpretation methods. This study found that the Critical Theory proposed by Horkheimer, Adorno, and Marcuse stagnated because they interpreted rationality as instrumental rationality. Meanwhile, Habermas’s refinement of Critical Theory led to the formation of the Critical Theory in a modified form, namely the Theory of Communicative Action. In this case, Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action provides a solution in the form of additional elements of communication for the Critical Theory and sees rationality as communicative rationality that allows interaction between subjects in social life.
从批判性到交际性
哈贝马斯的交往行为理论对于回应现代性、理性和资本主义具有重要意义。这一理论背离了法兰克福学派第一代以霍克海默、阿多诺、马尔库塞为代表的批判停滞理论的细化。因此,本研究旨在描述哈贝马斯在寻找批判理论停滞的原因和改进它方面所做的努力。本研究是具有文献背景的定性研究,因此通过阅读哈贝马斯等相关著作来收集数据。对收集到的数据进行数据分析,采用历史和解释方法。本研究发现,霍克海默、阿多诺和马尔库塞提出的批判理论之所以停滞不前,是因为他们将理性解释为工具理性。同时,哈贝马斯对批判理论的提炼,形成了一种改良的批判理论,即交往行为理论。在这种情况下,哈贝马斯的交往行为理论以交往的附加要素的形式为批判理论提供了一种解决方案,并将理性视为允许主体在社会生活中相互作用的交往理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信