{"title":"Can the Regime Type (Democracy versus Autocracy) Explain the COVID-19 Recovery Rates?","authors":"Yuval Arbel, Yifat Arbel, Amichai Kerner, Miryam Kerner","doi":"10.1007/s41111-022-00218-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 is an example of worldwide and unanticipated global crisis. This study provides an example of crisis management in different countries and regime types. Previous studies provide evidence supporting reduced infant mortality as well as increased life expectancy with higher levels of democracy. These findings lead to the conventional wisdom that democracies provide conditions that promote better health for their citizens. The current study seeks to investigate health-democracy relationship in the context of recovery from COVID-19 disease. Unlike the conventional wisdom and based on 169 countries and regions around the world, for which information regarding accumulated recovery rates from coronavirus and Freedom House measures of democracy are available, findings suggest better projected prospects of recovery from COVID-19 disease in more \"autocratic\" countries. These findings may be explained on the grounds of (1) inefficient law enforcement in more democratic countries and (2) stronger autoimmune response (a cytokine storm, associated with COVID-19 severity) in Western countries due to excessive hygienic environmental conditions and, consequently, lack of exposure to different pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":44455,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Political Science Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9181934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-022-00218-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
COVID-19 is an example of worldwide and unanticipated global crisis. This study provides an example of crisis management in different countries and regime types. Previous studies provide evidence supporting reduced infant mortality as well as increased life expectancy with higher levels of democracy. These findings lead to the conventional wisdom that democracies provide conditions that promote better health for their citizens. The current study seeks to investigate health-democracy relationship in the context of recovery from COVID-19 disease. Unlike the conventional wisdom and based on 169 countries and regions around the world, for which information regarding accumulated recovery rates from coronavirus and Freedom House measures of democracy are available, findings suggest better projected prospects of recovery from COVID-19 disease in more "autocratic" countries. These findings may be explained on the grounds of (1) inefficient law enforcement in more democratic countries and (2) stronger autoimmune response (a cytokine storm, associated with COVID-19 severity) in Western countries due to excessive hygienic environmental conditions and, consequently, lack of exposure to different pathogens.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to publish original and cutting-edge research in all areas of political science, such as political theory, comparative politics, international relations, public administration, public policy, methodology, and Chinese politics and government. In the meantime it also provides a major and visible platform for the intellectual dialogue between Chinese and international scholars, and disseminate scholarship that can shed light on the ever changing field of Chinese political studies, stimulate reflective discourse as the field continues to develop both within and outside China. All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review. In additional original research articles, Chinese Political Science Review also publishes book reviews to disseminate comprehensive reviews of emerging topics in all areas of political science.