Cost-benefit analysis of a population-based education program on the wise use of antibiotics

A. Mamun, Bin Zhao, Mark McCabe, Kim Dreher, M. Otterstatter, N. Smith, E. Blondel-Hill, F. Marra, D. Patrick
{"title":"Cost-benefit analysis of a population-based education program on the wise use of antibiotics","authors":"A. Mamun, Bin Zhao, Mark McCabe, Kim Dreher, M. Otterstatter, N. Smith, E. Blondel-Hill, F. Marra, D. Patrick","doi":"10.17269/s41997-019-00245-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2005, the Do Bugs Need Drugs (DBND) program was imported to British Columbia (BC) from Alberta with the goal of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the community. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of the program on antibiotic-associated costs and cost-benefit. We used data on antibiotic prescription and costs from BC PharmaNet for the period of 1996 to 2014. We conducted interrupted time series regression to formally interpret the impact of the DBND program. The average monthly prescription rate fell by 14.5%, from 54.3 to 46.4 per 1000 population between 2005 and 2014. The proportionate contribution of macrolide prescription decreased from 19.2% in 2005 to 13.2% in 2014 and for quinolones decreased from 13.1% in 2005 to 12% in 2014. The proportion of prescriptions for both penicillins and tetracyclines increased by > 35.5%. Before the program, the average monthly cost of antibiotics was increasing by CAD $8.12 per 1000 population (p < 0.001). After program introduction, average monthly cost decreased by CAD $18.19 per 1000 population (p < 0.001), creating an annual savings for BC in 2014 of CAD $83.6 million. In 2014, one Canadian dollar spent on the DBND program was associated with conservative savings of CAD $76.20. Significant cost savings have been observed in association with a community antimicrobial stewardship program focused on both public and prescribers. Such programs are an effective strategy in cost-benefit terms and should therefore be considered for universal adoption in Canadian healthcare systems.","PeriodicalId":9525,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","volume":"26 1","pages":"732 - 740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-019-00245-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In 2005, the Do Bugs Need Drugs (DBND) program was imported to British Columbia (BC) from Alberta with the goal of reducing unnecessary antibiotic use in the community. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of the program on antibiotic-associated costs and cost-benefit. We used data on antibiotic prescription and costs from BC PharmaNet for the period of 1996 to 2014. We conducted interrupted time series regression to formally interpret the impact of the DBND program. The average monthly prescription rate fell by 14.5%, from 54.3 to 46.4 per 1000 population between 2005 and 2014. The proportionate contribution of macrolide prescription decreased from 19.2% in 2005 to 13.2% in 2014 and for quinolones decreased from 13.1% in 2005 to 12% in 2014. The proportion of prescriptions for both penicillins and tetracyclines increased by > 35.5%. Before the program, the average monthly cost of antibiotics was increasing by CAD $8.12 per 1000 population (p < 0.001). After program introduction, average monthly cost decreased by CAD $18.19 per 1000 population (p < 0.001), creating an annual savings for BC in 2014 of CAD $83.6 million. In 2014, one Canadian dollar spent on the DBND program was associated with conservative savings of CAD $76.20. Significant cost savings have been observed in association with a community antimicrobial stewardship program focused on both public and prescribers. Such programs are an effective strategy in cost-benefit terms and should therefore be considered for universal adoption in Canadian healthcare systems.
以人群为基础的抗生素明智使用教育项目的成本效益分析
2005年,“虫子需要药物”项目从阿尔伯塔省引进不列颠哥伦比亚省,目的是减少社区不必要的抗生素使用。本研究的目的是估计该计划对抗生素相关成本和成本效益的影响。我们使用了BC PharmaNet 1996年至2014年期间的抗生素处方和费用数据。我们进行了中断时间序列回归,以正式解释DBND计划的影响。2005年至2014年间,每月平均处方率下降了14.5%,从每千人54.3人降至46.4人。大环内酯类药物处方占比从2005年的19.2%下降到2014年的13.2%,喹诺酮类药物处方占比从2005年的13.1%下降到2014年的12%。同时使用青霉素类和四环素类药物的处方比例增加了> 35.5%。在实施该计划之前,抗生素的平均每月费用每1000人增加8.12加元(p < 0.001)。项目实施后,每1000人每月平均成本下降18.19加元(p < 0.001), 2014年卑诗省每年节省8360万加元。2014年,在DBND项目上花费1加元,保守来说相当于节省76.20加元。已观察到与社区抗菌剂管理计划相关的显著成本节约,重点是公众和处方者。这样的方案是一个有效的策略,在成本效益方面,因此应考虑普遍采用在加拿大的医疗保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信