Functional Somatic Symptoms and Somatization: Person-centered Approach to Understanding their Relationships

Ariel D Falcoff
{"title":"Functional Somatic Symptoms and Somatization: Person-centered Approach to Understanding their Relationships","authors":"Ariel D Falcoff","doi":"10.5750/IJPCM.V7I4.672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the visible points of overlapping between the psychopathologic concepts of \"somatization\" and \"somatoform disorders\" with those of \"functional symptoms\" and \"somatic syndromes\" of general medicine, there is little literature which clarifies their relationships, making it difficult to formulate common grounds for work between psychiatry and the rest of medicine. Objectives: The purpose of this article is to review and critically analyze current knowledge on the subject, in search for conceptual links between different paradigms involving the underlying phenomena, proposing present and future lines of work according to the basic concepts of the Person Centered Medicine. Methodology: A wide ranging review and critical analysis of the literature on these subjects was conducted, trying to explore the relationship and integration of different paradigms according to the MCP framework and an outline of the author´s current research. Results: A need was found to establish transdisciplinary concepts which leave aside the particular visions of each paradigm, in search for links which may integrate different insights, considering the person as a whole. Therefore, it is essential to analyze carefully the phenomenon from various points of view to elucidate wider conceptualizations so as to reformulate this spectrum of phenomena from an integrative perspective. The possibility of the existence of a “general factor”, both present in the so-called “functional” disorder of general medicine, and in those that in psychopathology are grouped as somatization, is suggested. This general factor could be represented by certain personality dimensions and psychic representations encompassed by complex context variables. Conclusions: It would be valuable to continue with research of this phenomena structure as well as to look for strategies to benefit from the theoretical findings in the health care field, according to the proposals of Person Centered Medicine.","PeriodicalId":89680,"journal":{"name":"International journal of person centered medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of person centered medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V7I4.672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Despite the visible points of overlapping between the psychopathologic concepts of "somatization" and "somatoform disorders" with those of "functional symptoms" and "somatic syndromes" of general medicine, there is little literature which clarifies their relationships, making it difficult to formulate common grounds for work between psychiatry and the rest of medicine. Objectives: The purpose of this article is to review and critically analyze current knowledge on the subject, in search for conceptual links between different paradigms involving the underlying phenomena, proposing present and future lines of work according to the basic concepts of the Person Centered Medicine. Methodology: A wide ranging review and critical analysis of the literature on these subjects was conducted, trying to explore the relationship and integration of different paradigms according to the MCP framework and an outline of the author´s current research. Results: A need was found to establish transdisciplinary concepts which leave aside the particular visions of each paradigm, in search for links which may integrate different insights, considering the person as a whole. Therefore, it is essential to analyze carefully the phenomenon from various points of view to elucidate wider conceptualizations so as to reformulate this spectrum of phenomena from an integrative perspective. The possibility of the existence of a “general factor”, both present in the so-called “functional” disorder of general medicine, and in those that in psychopathology are grouped as somatization, is suggested. This general factor could be represented by certain personality dimensions and psychic representations encompassed by complex context variables. Conclusions: It would be valuable to continue with research of this phenomena structure as well as to look for strategies to benefit from the theoretical findings in the health care field, according to the proposals of Person Centered Medicine.
功能性躯体症状和躯体化:以人为中心的方法来理解它们之间的关系
背景:尽管“躯体化”和“躯体形式障碍”的精神病理学概念与普通医学的“功能症状”和“躯体综合征”之间存在明显的重叠点,但澄清它们之间关系的文献很少,因此很难在精神病学和其他医学之间制定共同的工作基础。目的:本文的目的是回顾和批判性地分析当前关于这一主题的知识,寻找涉及潜在现象的不同范式之间的概念联系,根据以人为本医学的基本概念提出当前和未来的工作方向。方法:对这些主题的文献进行了广泛的回顾和批判性分析,试图根据MCP框架和作者当前研究的大纲探索不同范式的关系和整合。结果:我们发现需要建立跨学科的概念,抛开每个范例的特定愿景,寻找可能整合不同见解的联系,将人视为一个整体。因此,有必要从不同的角度仔细分析这一现象,阐明更广泛的概念,以便从综合的角度重新制定这一现象谱。建议存在一种“一般因素”的可能性,既存在于一般医学的所谓“功能性”障碍中,也存在于精神病理学中被归类为躯体化的那些因素中。这一普遍因素可以通过某些人格维度和复杂环境变量所包含的心理表征来表示。结论:在以人为本医学的建议下,继续对这一现象结构进行研究,并寻求从卫生保健领域的理论发现中获益的策略是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信