Comparison of the Efficacy of Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus Airtraq Videolaryngoscope for Visualization of Laryngeal Structures at the End of Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Control Study.
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus Airtraq Videolaryngoscope for Visualization of Laryngeal Structures at the End of Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Control Study.","authors":"Geetanjali Tolia Chilkoti, Pallav Bhandari, M Mohta, Ashok Kumar Saxena, Ruchi Kapoor","doi":"10.1007/s12070-023-03828-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the efficacy of conventional Macintosh laryngoscope with Airtraq videolaryngoscope for visualization of laryngeal structures to rule out recurrent laryngeal nerve injury at the end of thyroidectomy. This randomized double-blind control study was conducted following IEC-Human approval, prospective CTRI registration and written informed consent from participants. Patients of either sex, aged 18-65 years, ASA grade I/II, scheduled for thyroidectomy under GA were included. Group DL underwent direct laryngoscopy using Macintosh blade whereas group VL underwent laryngoscopy using Airtraq® videolaryngoscope. CL(Cormack-Lehane) grade of laryngeal view, time taken to achieve optimal view, haemodynamic parameters, Patient reactivity score(PRS) and complications were noted. Unpaired t-test, chi-square test were used. A total of 73 patients were included for study with 38 in group DL and 35 in group VL. The grade of laryngeal view was found to be significantly better with Airtraq® VL compared to Macintosh laryngoscope without the application of BURP (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In the DL group, 34.2% (n = 13) had a CL grade I, 36.8% (n = 14) had CL grade 2A, 13.2% had CL grade 2B (n = 5) and 15.8% (n = 6) had CL Grade 3 at the end of thyroidectomy. On the contrary, in the VL Group, 71.5% (n = 25) of the participants had a CL Grade I; whereas, 20% (n = 7) had a CL Grade 2A, 5.7% (n = 2) had CL grade 2B and 2.8% (n = 1) of participants had CL grade 3. The mean \"time taken to achieve optimal view' was comparable between the two groups (DL = 39.16 ± 105.53 s vs. VL = 38.89 ± 20.69 s) (<i>p</i> = 0.988).The haemodynamic parameters, Patient reactivity score and complications were comparable between the two groups. The performance of Airtraq® videolaryngoscope, a channelled VL is better than conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of the optimal glottic view obtained to rule out recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy at the end of thyroidectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multivariate Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"3191-3198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10646054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multivariate Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-023-03828-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To compare the efficacy of conventional Macintosh laryngoscope with Airtraq videolaryngoscope for visualization of laryngeal structures to rule out recurrent laryngeal nerve injury at the end of thyroidectomy. This randomized double-blind control study was conducted following IEC-Human approval, prospective CTRI registration and written informed consent from participants. Patients of either sex, aged 18-65 years, ASA grade I/II, scheduled for thyroidectomy under GA were included. Group DL underwent direct laryngoscopy using Macintosh blade whereas group VL underwent laryngoscopy using Airtraq® videolaryngoscope. CL(Cormack-Lehane) grade of laryngeal view, time taken to achieve optimal view, haemodynamic parameters, Patient reactivity score(PRS) and complications were noted. Unpaired t-test, chi-square test were used. A total of 73 patients were included for study with 38 in group DL and 35 in group VL. The grade of laryngeal view was found to be significantly better with Airtraq® VL compared to Macintosh laryngoscope without the application of BURP (p < 0.05). In the DL group, 34.2% (n = 13) had a CL grade I, 36.8% (n = 14) had CL grade 2A, 13.2% had CL grade 2B (n = 5) and 15.8% (n = 6) had CL Grade 3 at the end of thyroidectomy. On the contrary, in the VL Group, 71.5% (n = 25) of the participants had a CL Grade I; whereas, 20% (n = 7) had a CL Grade 2A, 5.7% (n = 2) had CL grade 2B and 2.8% (n = 1) of participants had CL grade 3. The mean "time taken to achieve optimal view' was comparable between the two groups (DL = 39.16 ± 105.53 s vs. VL = 38.89 ± 20.69 s) (p = 0.988).The haemodynamic parameters, Patient reactivity score and complications were comparable between the two groups. The performance of Airtraq® videolaryngoscope, a channelled VL is better than conventional Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of the optimal glottic view obtained to rule out recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy at the end of thyroidectomy.
目的比较传统Macintosh喉镜与Airtraq视频喉镜对甲状腺切除术后喉返神经损伤的观察效果。这项随机双盲对照研究是在IEC-Human批准、前瞻性CTRI注册和参与者的书面知情同意后进行的。患者不分性别,年龄18-65岁,ASA分级为I/II级,在GA下计划行甲状腺切除术。DL组采用Macintosh刀片直接喉镜检查,而VL组采用Airtraq®视频喉镜检查。记录喉部观察的CL(Cormack-Lehane)分级、达到最佳观察所需时间、血流动力学参数、患者反应性评分(PRS)和并发症。采用非配对t检验、卡方检验。共纳入73例患者,其中DL组38例,VL组35例。与未应用BURP的Macintosh喉镜相比,使用Airtraq®VL喉镜的喉视图等级明显更好(p p = 0.988)。两组的血流动力学参数、患者反应性评分和并发症具有可比性。Airtraq®视频喉镜的性能,通道式VL在获得最佳声门视图以排除甲状腺切除术结束时喉返神经麻痹方面优于传统Macintosh喉镜。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1971, the Journal of Multivariate Analysis (JMVA) is the central venue for the publication of new, relevant methodology and particularly innovative applications pertaining to the analysis and interpretation of multidimensional data.
The journal welcomes contributions to all aspects of multivariate data analysis and modeling, including cluster analysis, discriminant analysis, factor analysis, and multidimensional continuous or discrete distribution theory. Topics of current interest include, but are not limited to, inferential aspects of
Copula modeling
Functional data analysis
Graphical modeling
High-dimensional data analysis
Image analysis
Multivariate extreme-value theory
Sparse modeling
Spatial statistics.