Investigation on Rooftop Rainwater Harvesting Potential and Roof Catchment Area Measurement Techniques in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Yalemzewd Abere Mulu
{"title":"Investigation on Rooftop Rainwater Harvesting Potential and Roof Catchment Area Measurement Techniques in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia","authors":"Yalemzewd Abere Mulu","doi":"10.7176/cer/12-8-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted by aiming quantification of the potential of rooftop rainwater harvesting (RT-RWH) in general and (1) comparing alternative methodologies for measuring roof catchment areas, (2) analyzing demand-supply gap between harvested rainwater and toilet flushing water demand in particular for the study area. A comparison was made between the roof catchment area measurement techniques such as; Google Earth (GE), Master Plan and field survey. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was used as a comparison tool for deciding which measurement techniques are better, so as to recommend for accurate usages for practical purposes for roof catchments areas measurements. Hence, R 2 values of field measurement versus Master Plan, field measurement versus GE, and Master Plan versus GE were found to be 0.997, 0.959 and 0.971 respectively. In the meantime, it was proved that measuring roof catchment areas by the Master Plan is better than GE for the case of this study area. In addition to this, the water harvesting potential of the study area was estimated and compared with the toilet flushing water demand (which accounts for the major portions of domestic water demand of the study area). The annually harvested rainwater of the study area was estimated to be 1 25,172m 3 and the respective annual toilet flushing water demand was 6,090,314m 3 . This result showed that 18.13% of water consumption of toilet flushing of the study area could be covered by the harvested rainwater, which is an indispensable figure to alleviate and minimize the ever-increasing water scarcity of the study area to some extent. Keywords: Rooftop-Rainwater Harvesting; Google Earth; Field Survey; Master Plan; Potential Assessment DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-8-03 Publication date: August 31 st 2020","PeriodicalId":10219,"journal":{"name":"Civil and environmental research","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and environmental research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/cer/12-8-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted by aiming quantification of the potential of rooftop rainwater harvesting (RT-RWH) in general and (1) comparing alternative methodologies for measuring roof catchment areas, (2) analyzing demand-supply gap between harvested rainwater and toilet flushing water demand in particular for the study area. A comparison was made between the roof catchment area measurement techniques such as; Google Earth (GE), Master Plan and field survey. The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was used as a comparison tool for deciding which measurement techniques are better, so as to recommend for accurate usages for practical purposes for roof catchments areas measurements. Hence, R 2 values of field measurement versus Master Plan, field measurement versus GE, and Master Plan versus GE were found to be 0.997, 0.959 and 0.971 respectively. In the meantime, it was proved that measuring roof catchment areas by the Master Plan is better than GE for the case of this study area. In addition to this, the water harvesting potential of the study area was estimated and compared with the toilet flushing water demand (which accounts for the major portions of domestic water demand of the study area). The annually harvested rainwater of the study area was estimated to be 1 25,172m 3 and the respective annual toilet flushing water demand was 6,090,314m 3 . This result showed that 18.13% of water consumption of toilet flushing of the study area could be covered by the harvested rainwater, which is an indispensable figure to alleviate and minimize the ever-increasing water scarcity of the study area to some extent. Keywords: Rooftop-Rainwater Harvesting; Google Earth; Field Survey; Master Plan; Potential Assessment DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-8-03 Publication date: August 31 st 2020
埃塞俄比亚首都亚的斯亚贝巴屋顶雨水收集潜力及屋顶集水区测量技术研究
本研究旨在量化屋顶雨水收集(RT-RWH)的潜力,并(1)比较测量屋顶集水区的替代方法,(2)分析收集的雨水与厕所冲水需求之间的供需差距,特别是研究区域。比较了屋顶集水区测量技术,如;谷歌地球(GE),总体规划和实地调查。决定系数(r2)被用作比较工具,以决定哪种测量技术更好,从而为屋顶集水区测量的实际用途推荐准确的用法。因此,野外测量相对于总体规划、野外测量相对于GE、总体规划相对于GE的r2值分别为0.997、0.959和0.971。同时,证明了在本研究区域的情况下,采用总体规划法测量屋顶集水区面积优于GE法。此外,我们亦估算研究区内的集水潜力,并与厕水需求(厕水需求占研究区内生活用水需求的主要部分)进行比较。研究区每年收集的雨水估计为1 25,172立方米,而厕水的年需水量则分别为6,090,314立方米。结果表明,研究区抽水马桶用水量的18.13%可以被收集的雨水覆盖,这在一定程度上是缓解和减少研究区日益严重的缺水问题不可或缺的数字。关键词:屋面雨水收集;谷歌地球;实地调查;总体规划;潜在评估DOI: 10.7176/CER/12-8-03出版日期:2020年8月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信