EBM in der Krise? Ein Kommentar zur Notwendigkeit zeithistorischer medizinischer Analysen der evidence-based medicine

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Frank Huisman, T. Bolt
{"title":"EBM in der Krise? Ein Kommentar zur Notwendigkeit zeithistorischer medizinischer Analysen der evidence-based medicine","authors":"Frank Huisman, T. Bolt","doi":"10.25162/medhist-2018-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is in a state of crisis. This message was brought forward in a recent, widely discussed paper in the British Medical Journal published in 1014 by prominent representatives of the EBM-movement itself. The authors also present a way out of the crisis: a return to the original founding principles of EBM. They sketch an image of both a golden past and a golden future of real evidence-based medicine that we, as historians, find rather problematic. We therefore aim to inform the current debate about the crisis of EBM historically by describing four ways in which EBM has evolved in the past 25 years.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2018-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is in a state of crisis. This message was brought forward in a recent, widely discussed paper in the British Medical Journal published in 1014 by prominent representatives of the EBM-movement itself. The authors also present a way out of the crisis: a return to the original founding principles of EBM. They sketch an image of both a golden past and a golden future of real evidence-based medicine that we, as historians, find rather problematic. We therefore aim to inform the current debate about the crisis of EBM historically by describing four ways in which EBM has evolved in the past 25 years.
危机中的埃博拉?以证据为依据的最新医学分析是必要的评论
循证医学(EBM)正处于危机状态。这一信息是由ebm运动本身的杰出代表于2014年在《英国医学杂志》上发表的一篇最近被广泛讨论的论文中提出的。两位作者还提出了一条走出危机的出路:回归循证医学最初的创始原则。他们描绘了一幅真实的循证医学的黄金过去和黄金未来的图景,作为历史学家,我们认为这相当成问题。因此,我们旨在通过描述实证医学在过去25年中发展的四种方式,为当前关于实证医学危机的历史辩论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medizinhistorisches Journal
Medizinhistorisches Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信