{"title":"Disability and the Playing Field: Jane Addams, Sports, and the Possibility of Inclusion","authors":"Nate Whelan-Jackson","doi":"10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Jane Addams analyzes recreation, and particularly sports, as a domain in which people are “revealed” to one another, affording sympathetic knowledge of the other. This function is integral to a democratic way of life; thus, she maintains that cities have an obligation to provide recreational opportunity. Some disability theorists challenge whether athletics can serve this revelatory function in contexts of disability, since esteem for an athletic performance supposedly takes place against a backdrop of “normal” functioning. On this view, disabled people might be subjects of “social inclusion,” the recognition of someone as an abstract bearer of rights, but not “community inclusion,” recognized as a subject of love or esteem by virtue of some contribution to a publicly acknowledged good. In this article I contend that Addams’s comments on confronting disability’s isolating barriers in the context of education disclose the malleability of this background and afford an avenue for understanding the potential for athletics to serve as a locus of community inclusion for disabled people.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TRANCHARPEIRSOC.56.4.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract:Jane Addams analyzes recreation, and particularly sports, as a domain in which people are “revealed” to one another, affording sympathetic knowledge of the other. This function is integral to a democratic way of life; thus, she maintains that cities have an obligation to provide recreational opportunity. Some disability theorists challenge whether athletics can serve this revelatory function in contexts of disability, since esteem for an athletic performance supposedly takes place against a backdrop of “normal” functioning. On this view, disabled people might be subjects of “social inclusion,” the recognition of someone as an abstract bearer of rights, but not “community inclusion,” recognized as a subject of love or esteem by virtue of some contribution to a publicly acknowledged good. In this article I contend that Addams’s comments on confronting disability’s isolating barriers in the context of education disclose the malleability of this background and afford an avenue for understanding the potential for athletics to serve as a locus of community inclusion for disabled people.
期刊介绍:
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society has been the premier peer-reviewed journal specializing in the history of American philosophy since its founding in 1965. Although named for the founder of American pragmatism, American philosophers of all schools and periods, from the colonial to the recent past, are extensively discussed. TCSPS regularly includes essays, and every significant book published in the field is discussed in a review essay. A subscription to the journal includes membership in the Charles S. Peirce Society, which was founded in 1946 by Frederic H. Young. The purpose of the Society is to encourage study of and communication about the work of Peirce and its ongoing influence in the many fields of intellectual endeavor to which he contributed.