{"title":"Challenges to develop scientometric studies","authors":"A. Guskov, Y. Shrayberg","doi":"10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-37-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors examine the key problems inhibiting scientometric studies and scientific communications. These challenges call for significant efforts and professional courage. Firstly, this is the need for open access to scientometric data and improvement of their quality and comprehensiveness, including author data, affiliations, citations and meta information. The authors emphasize the necessity for large-scale introduction of technologies for identifying objects of science information (i. e. publications, researchers, organizations, projects, etc.), which would enable to decrease significantly the number of bibliographic mistakes.When projecting scientometric studies, the edge of objects and analysis instruments have to be defined by the goals rather than by bibliometric database limitations. Indexing of scientific publications is among the key instruments. Its advancement is determined by emerging and low-quality classifications of bibliometric databases, their differences, and changing science structure. Finally, the propriety of scientometric methods and results interpretation, in particular that of scientometric performance assessment, have to be controlled. Meeting these challenges will enable to provide efficient monitoring of scientific activity based on operative collection, processing and analysis of scientific information flows rather than on annual statistical surveys. This transfer would improve monitoring significantly and expand the spectrum of solutions; it would also enable to reveal system changes in research, to respond to disparities in development, and to make the solutions in science management more efficient.","PeriodicalId":42851,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnye i Tekhnicheskie Biblioteki-Scientific and Technical Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2023-2-37-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The authors examine the key problems inhibiting scientometric studies and scientific communications. These challenges call for significant efforts and professional courage. Firstly, this is the need for open access to scientometric data and improvement of their quality and comprehensiveness, including author data, affiliations, citations and meta information. The authors emphasize the necessity for large-scale introduction of technologies for identifying objects of science information (i. e. publications, researchers, organizations, projects, etc.), which would enable to decrease significantly the number of bibliographic mistakes.When projecting scientometric studies, the edge of objects and analysis instruments have to be defined by the goals rather than by bibliometric database limitations. Indexing of scientific publications is among the key instruments. Its advancement is determined by emerging and low-quality classifications of bibliometric databases, their differences, and changing science structure. Finally, the propriety of scientometric methods and results interpretation, in particular that of scientometric performance assessment, have to be controlled. Meeting these challenges will enable to provide efficient monitoring of scientific activity based on operative collection, processing and analysis of scientific information flows rather than on annual statistical surveys. This transfer would improve monitoring significantly and expand the spectrum of solutions; it would also enable to reveal system changes in research, to respond to disparities in development, and to make the solutions in science management more efficient.