On Lassner's Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film

IF 0.1 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
T. Manning
{"title":"On Lassner's Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film","authors":"T. Manning","doi":"10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.5.1.0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On Lassner's Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film. By Phyllis Lassner. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016. 272 pp., ISBN 9781474401104 (hc); 978-1474416733 (ePub); 978-1474401111 (PDF). £70 (all editions).This important book is testament to a growing-and welcome-tendency to analyze the espionage genre as a political phenomenon. In Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film, Phyllis Lassner does not view spy fiction and film as disposable entertainment, as \"mass culture,\" or through the filter of genre (in all of which history tends to disappear), but as widely disseminated products, reflectors, and even shapers ofhistory and politics. In her words: \"these fictions construct a multivocal form of cultural production that commingles propaganda, popular entertainment and cultural history\" (3). Lassner's central argument is original, productive, and persuasive, if not always easily grasped: how espionage fiction intersects with Jewish experience from the 1930s to the 1960s -what Lassner calls \"exile as a political condition and a state of being and identity\" (3) versus the \"'fixed' dominant position of totalitarian nationalism\" (8).Lassner's incorporation of cinema alongside literary fiction reflects not token interdisciplinarianism but a sure grasp ofthe reality ofhow spy stories are consumed. The hybrid literary-cinematic legacy ofJames Bond has become paradigmatic, with filmed versions of John le Carre's work, from Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (Tomas Alfredson, France, UK, Germany, 2011) to The Night Manager (Susanne Bier, UK, BBC, 2016), disseminating-and, yes, sometimes distorting-their literary originals. Using the contemporary TV series The Americans (USA, FX Network, 2013-)-inspired by real-life Soviet \"sleeper\" agents in Cold War America-as a jumping-off point, Lassner emphasizes how exile is the lived reality of secret agents but also, more audaciously, argues that such separation from nation-states also creates distance from national ideologies. Thus Lassner argues that spies and Jews occupy a shared liminal political space in espionage fiction.Lassner's approach is highly effective in reframing the 1930s novels of Eric Ambler, wherein the recurring figures of the stateless, the exiled, and the persecuted-conventionally critically figured as \"amateurs\" or \"innocents\"-now function as cyphers for the Jew amid the upheavals of asylum-less 1930s Europe. Lassner shows how, far from being sublimated British state propaganda, Ambler's fiction argued fervently against the British state's appeasement of Germany. German expressionist cinema (referenced throughout the book) and Ambler's work is particularly effective: Crepuscular imagery and gothic architecture capture a paranoia, an existential malaise, as filmmakers and novelist look over their shoulders at the materializing specter of fascism. Also somewhat shadowy in Lassner's analysis, however, is Ambler's Popular Front politics, however, in which communism was a key component.A chapter on women espionage fiction writers Pamela Frankau, Ann Bridge, and Helen MacInnes is also important, given these writers' critical neglect in the male-dominated world ofspy fiction. Here the Jewish connection is intrinsic rather than metaphoric, and Lassner convincingly argues that exile, by displacing women from domestic gender roles, also uncouples national-patriarchal ideology. The heroines in Bridge's A Place to Stand (1953) and MacInnes's While We Still Live (1944) become Polish refugees in solidarity, while MacInnes's Above Suspicion (1941) uses the city of Nuremberg to obliquely highlight the plight of Jews in Nazi Germany. …","PeriodicalId":40351,"journal":{"name":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"116 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jewish Film & New Media-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13110/JEWIFILMNEWMEDI.5.1.0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On Lassner's Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film. By Phyllis Lassner. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2016. 272 pp., ISBN 9781474401104 (hc); 978-1474416733 (ePub); 978-1474401111 (PDF). £70 (all editions).This important book is testament to a growing-and welcome-tendency to analyze the espionage genre as a political phenomenon. In Espionage and Exile: Fascism and Anti-Fascism in British Spy Fiction and Film, Phyllis Lassner does not view spy fiction and film as disposable entertainment, as "mass culture," or through the filter of genre (in all of which history tends to disappear), but as widely disseminated products, reflectors, and even shapers ofhistory and politics. In her words: "these fictions construct a multivocal form of cultural production that commingles propaganda, popular entertainment and cultural history" (3). Lassner's central argument is original, productive, and persuasive, if not always easily grasped: how espionage fiction intersects with Jewish experience from the 1930s to the 1960s -what Lassner calls "exile as a political condition and a state of being and identity" (3) versus the "'fixed' dominant position of totalitarian nationalism" (8).Lassner's incorporation of cinema alongside literary fiction reflects not token interdisciplinarianism but a sure grasp ofthe reality ofhow spy stories are consumed. The hybrid literary-cinematic legacy ofJames Bond has become paradigmatic, with filmed versions of John le Carre's work, from Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy (Tomas Alfredson, France, UK, Germany, 2011) to The Night Manager (Susanne Bier, UK, BBC, 2016), disseminating-and, yes, sometimes distorting-their literary originals. Using the contemporary TV series The Americans (USA, FX Network, 2013-)-inspired by real-life Soviet "sleeper" agents in Cold War America-as a jumping-off point, Lassner emphasizes how exile is the lived reality of secret agents but also, more audaciously, argues that such separation from nation-states also creates distance from national ideologies. Thus Lassner argues that spies and Jews occupy a shared liminal political space in espionage fiction.Lassner's approach is highly effective in reframing the 1930s novels of Eric Ambler, wherein the recurring figures of the stateless, the exiled, and the persecuted-conventionally critically figured as "amateurs" or "innocents"-now function as cyphers for the Jew amid the upheavals of asylum-less 1930s Europe. Lassner shows how, far from being sublimated British state propaganda, Ambler's fiction argued fervently against the British state's appeasement of Germany. German expressionist cinema (referenced throughout the book) and Ambler's work is particularly effective: Crepuscular imagery and gothic architecture capture a paranoia, an existential malaise, as filmmakers and novelist look over their shoulders at the materializing specter of fascism. Also somewhat shadowy in Lassner's analysis, however, is Ambler's Popular Front politics, however, in which communism was a key component.A chapter on women espionage fiction writers Pamela Frankau, Ann Bridge, and Helen MacInnes is also important, given these writers' critical neglect in the male-dominated world ofspy fiction. Here the Jewish connection is intrinsic rather than metaphoric, and Lassner convincingly argues that exile, by displacing women from domestic gender roles, also uncouples national-patriarchal ideology. The heroines in Bridge's A Place to Stand (1953) and MacInnes's While We Still Live (1944) become Polish refugees in solidarity, while MacInnes's Above Suspicion (1941) uses the city of Nuremberg to obliquely highlight the plight of Jews in Nazi Germany. …
论拉斯纳的《间谍与流放:英国间谍小说与电影中的法西斯主义与反法西斯主义
《间谍与流亡:英国间谍小说与电影中的法西斯主义与反法西斯主义》菲利斯·拉斯纳著。爱丁堡:爱丁堡大学出版社,2016。272页,ISBN 9781474401104 (hc);978 - 1474416733 (ePub);978 - 1474401111 (PDF)。70英镑(所有版本)。这本重要的书证明了一种越来越受欢迎的趋势,即把间谍题材作为一种政治现象来分析。在《间谍与流放:英国间谍小说和电影中的法西斯主义和反法西斯主义》一书中,菲利斯·拉斯纳并没有把间谍小说和电影看作是一次性的娱乐,“大众文化”,或者是通过类型的过滤(在所有这些类型中,历史都倾向于消失),而是将其视为广泛传播的产品、反映者,甚至是历史和政治的塑造者。用她的话说:“这些小说构建了一种多声音的文化生产形式,将宣传、大众娱乐和文化历史融合在一起”(3)。拉斯纳的核心论点是原创的、富有成效的、有说服力的,如果不总是容易理解的话:从20世纪30年代到60年代,间谍小说是如何与犹太人的经历交织在一起的——拉斯纳称之为“流亡作为一种政治条件,一种存在和身份的状态”(3)与“极权民族主义的‘固定’主导地位”(8)。拉斯纳将电影与文学小说结合在一起,反映的不是象征性的跨学科主义,而是对间谍故事如何被消费的现实的把握。詹姆斯·邦德的文学和电影混合遗产已经成为典范,约翰·勒·卡雷的作品被改编成电影,从《锅匠、裁缝、士兵、间谍》(托马斯·阿尔弗莱德森,法国、英国、德国,2011年)到《夜班经理》(苏珊娜·比尔,英国,BBC, 2016年),传播——是的,有时是扭曲——它们的文学原作。以当代电视剧《美国人》(美国,FX网络,2013年至今)为出发点,Lassner强调流亡是特工的生活现实,但更大胆的是,这种与民族国家的分离也造成了与民族意识形态的距离。这部电视剧的灵感来自于冷战时期美国的苏联“潜伏”特工。因此,拉斯纳认为,间谍和犹太人在间谍小说中占据了一个共同的有限的政治空间。拉斯纳的方法在重构埃里克·安布勒(Eric Ambler) 20世纪30年代的小说中非常有效,其中反复出现的无国籍者、被放逐者和受迫害者的形象——通常被批评为“业余者”或“无辜者”——现在在没有庇护的20世纪30年代欧洲的动荡中充当了犹太人的密码。拉斯纳展示了安布勒的小说如何强烈反对英国政府对德国的绥靖政策,而不是升华英国政府的宣传。德国表现主义电影(贯穿全书)和安布勒的作品尤其有效:黄昏的意象和哥特式建筑捕捉了一种偏执,一种存在主义的不安,就像电影制作人和小说家在他们的身后看着法西斯主义的幽灵一样。然而,在拉斯纳的分析中,同样有些模糊的是安布勒的人民阵线政治,共产主义是其中的关键组成部分。关于女性间谍小说作家帕梅拉·弗兰考、安·布里奇和海伦·麦金尼斯的一章也很重要,因为这些作家在男性主导的间谍小说世界中被忽视了。在这里,犹太人的联系是内在的,而不是隐喻性的。拉斯纳令人信服地认为,通过将女性从家庭性别角色中取代出来,流亡也解除了民族父权意识形态。布里奇的《站立的地方》(1953)和麦金尼斯的《我们还活着的时候》(1944)中的女主人公团结一致成为波兰难民,而麦金尼斯的《不容置疑》(1941)则利用纽伦堡这座城市间接地突出了纳粹德国犹太人的困境。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Jewish Film & New Media provides an outlet for research into any aspect of Jewish film, television, and new media and is unique in its interdisciplinary nature, exploring the rich and diverse cultural heritage across the globe. The journal is distinctive in bringing together a range of cinemas, televisions, films, programs, and other digital material in one volume and in its positioning of the discussions within a range of contexts—the cultural, historical, textual, and many others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信