PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS IN REGULATION OF LAND USE

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
G. N. Eyrian
{"title":"PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INTERESTS IN REGULATION OF LAND USE","authors":"G. N. Eyrian","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2021-54-699-721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: the article analyzes the evolution of Russian legislation on the use of land plots in the post-Soviet period from the perspective of public and private interests as reflected therein. Purpose: to analyze the development of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the use of land plots, with a focus on relations regarding the economic exploitation of the land plot as a natural resource; to assess current legislation from the perspective of the balance of public and private interests. Methods: methods of formal logic, historical, comparative legal and system-structural methods. Results: the development of legislation on the use of land plots in the Russian Federation has been inconsistent. At the first stage, before the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the public interest acted as the limit of the exercise of ownership of land and other natural resources. The Constitution of the Russian Federation does not directly establish the social function of ownership of land and other natural resources. The provisions of the Constitution imply the potential opportunity for the development of various concepts of ownership in land law. Currently, the Land Code of the Russian Federation reflects the social function of ownership, which follows from a number of basic principles of land legislation. The legislator subordinated the regulation of relations on the use of land plots to public interests and, at the same time, liberalized the rights and obligations of the owners of land plots in contrast to the Land Code of the RSFSR of 1991. From our point of view, this circumstance demonstrates the legislator's desire to harmonize land and civil legislation in the regulation of land use.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2021-54-699-721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: the article analyzes the evolution of Russian legislation on the use of land plots in the post-Soviet period from the perspective of public and private interests as reflected therein. Purpose: to analyze the development of the legislation of the Russian Federation on the use of land plots, with a focus on relations regarding the economic exploitation of the land plot as a natural resource; to assess current legislation from the perspective of the balance of public and private interests. Methods: methods of formal logic, historical, comparative legal and system-structural methods. Results: the development of legislation on the use of land plots in the Russian Federation has been inconsistent. At the first stage, before the adoption of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the public interest acted as the limit of the exercise of ownership of land and other natural resources. The Constitution of the Russian Federation does not directly establish the social function of ownership of land and other natural resources. The provisions of the Constitution imply the potential opportunity for the development of various concepts of ownership in land law. Currently, the Land Code of the Russian Federation reflects the social function of ownership, which follows from a number of basic principles of land legislation. The legislator subordinated the regulation of relations on the use of land plots to public interests and, at the same time, liberalized the rights and obligations of the owners of land plots in contrast to the Land Code of the RSFSR of 1991. From our point of view, this circumstance demonstrates the legislator's desire to harmonize land and civil legislation in the regulation of land use.
规管土地使用的公共及私人利益
导言:本文从俄罗斯土地利用立法中体现的公共利益和私人利益的角度,分析了后苏联时期俄罗斯土地利用立法的演变。目的:分析俄罗斯联邦土地利用立法的发展,重点关注土地作为自然资源的经济开发关系;从公私利益平衡的角度评价现行立法。方法:形式逻辑方法、历史方法、比较法学方法和系统结构方法。结果:俄罗斯联邦关于土地使用的立法的发展是不一致的。在第一阶段,在通过俄罗斯联邦宪法之前,公共利益是行使土地和其他自然资源所有权的限制。俄罗斯联邦宪法没有直接规定土地和其他自然资源所有权的社会功能。《宪法》的规定意味着在土地法中发展各种所有权概念的潜在机会。目前,俄罗斯联邦的《土地法》反映了所有权的社会功能,这是从土地立法的一些基本原则中产生的。立法者将对土地使用关系的监管从属于公共利益,与此同时,与1991年俄罗斯联邦社会主义共和国的《土地法》相比,放宽了土地所有者的权利和义务。从我们的角度来看,这种情况表明了立法者在土地使用监管中协调土地立法与民事立法的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信