G. Knežević, Vladan Pavlović, Radica Bojičić
{"title":"AUDITING ENGAGEMENT VS. CLIENT BOARD GENDER DIVERSITY AND INDEPENDENCE – ARE THERE ANY RELATIONSHIPS?","authors":"G. Knežević, Vladan Pavlović, Radica Bojičić","doi":"10.46763/bssr2219205k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to answer the question of whether corporate governance in terms of gender structure of client corporate boards and CEO duality impact client's incentive and ability to engage in high-qualityaudit in companies a year before the Covid outbreak. Private and public corporations are included in the sample and statistical analysis is applied on auditor reports and client board characteristics (gender and independence) to find the existing relationships. The study revealed that client boards are more male-dominated, with much of them having CEO duality experience and therefore more being prone to engage a local auditor, much less to engage an international auditor, and reports are signed by a male auditor in more of the cases. Results also support the fact that auditing companies have been paying attention to gender issues with half of the auditors signing the report being female. It was found that gender composition of client board and CEO duality and audit opinion are not interrelated which is in line with other studies. The paper extends the growing literature on the linkage between audit quality board characteristics and it overcomes the limitation observed in previous studies by testing the idea that gender and independence are variables of primary influence on auditor engagement. © 2022, Goce Delchev University of Shtip. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":36799,"journal":{"name":"Balkan Social Science Review","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46763/bssr2219205k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
审计业务与客户董事会性别多样性和独立性之间是否存在关系?
本文的目的是回答客户公司董事会性别结构和CEO二元性方面的公司治理是否会影响客户在新冠疫情爆发前一年参与公司高质量审计的激励和能力。样本中包括私营和公共公司,并对审计报告和客户董事会特征(性别和独立性)进行统计分析,以发现现有关系。研究显示,客户董事会在更大程度上以男性为主导,其中许多人拥有CEO双重身份的经验,因此更倾向于聘请本地审计师,聘请国际审计师的情况要少得多,而且在更多情况下,报告由男性审计师签署。调查结果还表明,审计公司一直在关注性别问题,签署报告的审计人员中有一半是女性。发现客户董事会的性别构成和CEO的二元性与审计意见不相关,这与其他研究结果一致。本文扩展了越来越多的关于审计质量委员会特征之间联系的文献,并通过检验性别和独立性是影响审计业务的主要变量这一观点,克服了以往研究中观察到的局限性。©2022,施蒂普Goce Delchev大学。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。