Prediction of Pollutant Emissions from Bluff-Body Stabilised Nonpremixed Flames

IF 1.5 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
N. Munteanu, Shokri M. Amzaini
{"title":"Prediction of Pollutant Emissions from Bluff-Body Stabilised Nonpremixed Flames","authors":"N. Munteanu, Shokri M. Amzaini","doi":"10.1155/2018/8924370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction of a stable flame is one of the critical design requirements in developing practical combustion systems. Flames stabilised by a bluff-body are extensively used in certain types of combustors. The design promotes mixing of cold reactants and hot products on the flame surface to improve the flame stability. In this study, bluff-body stabilised methane-hydrogen flames are computed using the steady laminar flamelet combustion method in conjunction with the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach. These flames are known as Sandia jet flames and have different jet mean velocities. The turbulence is modelled using the standard k-ϵ model and the chemical kinetics are modelled using the GRI-mechanism with 325 chemical reactions and 53 species. The computed mean reactive scalars of interest are compared with the experimental measurements at different axial locations in the flame. The computed values are in reasonably good agreement with the experimental data. Although some underpredictions are observed mainly for NO and CO at downstream locations in the flame, these results are consistent with earlier reported studies using more complex combustion models. The reason for these discrepancies is that the flamelet model is not adequate to capture the finite-rate chemistry effects and shear turbulence specifically, for species with a slow time scale such as nitrogen oxides.","PeriodicalId":44364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Combustion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8924370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Construction of a stable flame is one of the critical design requirements in developing practical combustion systems. Flames stabilised by a bluff-body are extensively used in certain types of combustors. The design promotes mixing of cold reactants and hot products on the flame surface to improve the flame stability. In this study, bluff-body stabilised methane-hydrogen flames are computed using the steady laminar flamelet combustion method in conjunction with the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) approach. These flames are known as Sandia jet flames and have different jet mean velocities. The turbulence is modelled using the standard k-ϵ model and the chemical kinetics are modelled using the GRI-mechanism with 325 chemical reactions and 53 species. The computed mean reactive scalars of interest are compared with the experimental measurements at different axial locations in the flame. The computed values are in reasonably good agreement with the experimental data. Although some underpredictions are observed mainly for NO and CO at downstream locations in the flame, these results are consistent with earlier reported studies using more complex combustion models. The reason for these discrepancies is that the flamelet model is not adequate to capture the finite-rate chemistry effects and shear turbulence specifically, for species with a slow time scale such as nitrogen oxides.
崖体稳定非预混火焰的污染物排放预测
构建稳定的火焰是开发实际燃烧系统的关键设计要求之一。由崖体稳定的火焰广泛用于某些类型的燃烧器。这种设计促进了冷反应物和热产物在火焰表面的混合,提高了火焰的稳定性。在本研究中,使用稳定层流小火焰燃烧方法结合reynolds -average Navier-Stokes (RANS)方法计算了崖体稳定的甲烷-氢火焰。这些火焰被称为桑迪亚喷射火焰,具有不同的喷射平均速度。湍流模型采用标准k- λ模型,化学动力学模型采用包含325种化学反应和53种物质的gri机制。计算得到的平均反应量与火焰中不同轴向位置的实验测量值进行了比较。计算值与实验数据符合得相当好。虽然在火焰的下游位置观察到一些对NO和CO的低估,但这些结果与先前报道的使用更复杂的燃烧模型的研究一致。产生这些差异的原因是,火焰模型不足以捕捉有限速率的化学效应和剪切湍流,特别是对于具有缓慢时间尺度的物种,如氮氧化物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Combustion
Journal of Combustion ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
8
审稿时长
20 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信