Lost harvest: examining the association between postharvest food loss and food insecurity in semi-arid Ghana

IF 6.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
M. Kansanga, Kamaldeen Mohammed, E. Batung, Sulemana Ansumah Saaka, I. Luginaah
{"title":"Lost harvest: examining the association between postharvest food loss and food insecurity in semi-arid Ghana","authors":"M. Kansanga, Kamaldeen Mohammed, E. Batung, Sulemana Ansumah Saaka, I. Luginaah","doi":"10.1080/13504509.2023.2198507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT According to the World Resources Institute, about one in every four calories produced for human consumption globally is not eventually consumed by humans. In sub-Saharan Africa, postharvest food loss (PHL) alone accounts for 20–30% of annual production, with an estimated value of 1.6 billion USD. Yet, agricultural policies that target improving food security have largely focused on augmenting productivity with little attention to PHL reduction. That notwithstanding, PHL has the potential to undermine several key dimensions of food insecurity. For instance, it can compromise household food reserves and drive food price hikes. Reductions in food quality may also impact food utilization. The prevalence of PHL and its relationship with food insecurity, however, remains underexplored. Using a cross-sectional survey of smallholder farming households (n = 1100) in Ghana, we examined the association between PHL and food insecurity. Our findings show that, on average, 22% of household harvest is lost postharvest. Nested ordered logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between PHL and food insecurity. A unit increase in PHL (OR = 1.08; p ≤ 0.05) was significantly associated with an 8% increase in the odds of being severely food insecure. Our findings provide an empirical basis for the argument that addressing PHL is a viable entry point for addressing food insecurity in the Global South. While it is crucial to pay attention to production concerns, food policy must simultaneously address postharvest management challenges of smallholder farmers. Policies that prioritize investment in contextually relevant and low-cost solutions to postharvest management will be timely.","PeriodicalId":50287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology","volume":"5 1","pages":"776 - 791"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2198507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT According to the World Resources Institute, about one in every four calories produced for human consumption globally is not eventually consumed by humans. In sub-Saharan Africa, postharvest food loss (PHL) alone accounts for 20–30% of annual production, with an estimated value of 1.6 billion USD. Yet, agricultural policies that target improving food security have largely focused on augmenting productivity with little attention to PHL reduction. That notwithstanding, PHL has the potential to undermine several key dimensions of food insecurity. For instance, it can compromise household food reserves and drive food price hikes. Reductions in food quality may also impact food utilization. The prevalence of PHL and its relationship with food insecurity, however, remains underexplored. Using a cross-sectional survey of smallholder farming households (n = 1100) in Ghana, we examined the association between PHL and food insecurity. Our findings show that, on average, 22% of household harvest is lost postharvest. Nested ordered logistic regression analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between PHL and food insecurity. A unit increase in PHL (OR = 1.08; p ≤ 0.05) was significantly associated with an 8% increase in the odds of being severely food insecure. Our findings provide an empirical basis for the argument that addressing PHL is a viable entry point for addressing food insecurity in the Global South. While it is crucial to pay attention to production concerns, food policy must simultaneously address postharvest management challenges of smallholder farmers. Policies that prioritize investment in contextually relevant and low-cost solutions to postharvest management will be timely.
收成损失:研究半干旱加纳收获后粮食损失与粮食不安全之间的关系
根据世界资源研究所的数据,全球人类消费的每四卡路里中约有一卡路里最终不会被人类消耗。在撒哈拉以南非洲,仅收获后粮食损失就占到年产量的20-30%,估计价值为16亿美元。然而,以改善粮食安全为目标的农业政策主要侧重于提高生产力,而很少关注减少ph。尽管如此,哲学研究仍有可能破坏粮食不安全的几个关键方面。例如,它可能影响家庭粮食储备,并推动粮食价格上涨。食品质量的下降也可能影响食品的利用。然而,PHL的流行及其与粮食不安全的关系仍未得到充分探讨。通过对加纳小农家庭(n = 1100)的横断面调查,我们检验了ph与粮食不安全之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,平均22%的家庭收成在收获后损失掉了。嵌套有序逻辑回归分析显示,PHL与粮食不安全之间存在显著的统计学关系。PHL增加1个单位(OR = 1.08;P≤0.05)与严重粮食不安全几率增加8%显著相关。我们的研究结果为以下论点提供了经验基础:解决PHL问题是解决全球南方粮食不安全问题的可行切入点。虽然关注生产问题至关重要,但粮食政策必须同时解决小农的收获后管理挑战。优先投资于与实际情况相关的低成本采收后管理解决方案的政策将是及时的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
58
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology is now over fifteen years old and has proved to be an exciting forum for understanding and advancing our knowledge and implementation of sustainable development. Sustainable development is now of primary importance as the key to future use and management of finite world resources. It recognises the need for development opportunities while maintaining a balance between these and the environment. As stated by the UN Bruntland Commission in 1987, sustainable development should "meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信