{"title":"Central American Rivers as Sites of Colonial Contestation","authors":"A. Kane","doi":"10.31261/rias.10043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the introduction to Troubled Waters: Rivers in Latin American Imagination (2013), Elizabeth Pettinaroli and Ana María Mutis have argued that rivers in Latin American literature constitute a “locus for the literary exploration of questions of power, identity, resistance, and discontent.” Many works of testimonial literature and literature of resistance written during and about the Central American civil wars of the 1970s and 1980s as a means of denouncing and resisting various forms of oppression would support their thesis. In the 2004 film Innocent Voices, directed by Luis Mandoki, Mario Bencastro’s 1997 story “Había una vez un río,” and Claribel Alegría’s 1983 poem “La mujer del Río Sumpul,” the traumatic events in the protagonists’ lives that occur in and near rivers create an inversion of the conventional use of rivers as symbols of life, purity, innocence, and re-creation by associating them with violence, death, and destruction. At the same time, the river often becomes a metaphor for the wounds of trauma, which allude to the psychological suffering not only of the protagonists, but to the collective pain of their countries torn asunder by war. Arturo Arias’s 2015 novel El precio del consuelo also features a river as the site of state-sponsored violence against rural citizens during the civil war period. In contrast with Bencastro’s and Alegria’s texts, however, Arias’s novel highlights issues of environmental justice related to the use of rivers in Central America that continue to plague the region to date. In the present essay, I argue that these works are compelling representations of the ways in which rivers have become sites of contestation between colonial and decolonial forces in Central America.","PeriodicalId":37268,"journal":{"name":"Review of International American Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/rias.10043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the introduction to Troubled Waters: Rivers in Latin American Imagination (2013), Elizabeth Pettinaroli and Ana María Mutis have argued that rivers in Latin American literature constitute a “locus for the literary exploration of questions of power, identity, resistance, and discontent.” Many works of testimonial literature and literature of resistance written during and about the Central American civil wars of the 1970s and 1980s as a means of denouncing and resisting various forms of oppression would support their thesis. In the 2004 film Innocent Voices, directed by Luis Mandoki, Mario Bencastro’s 1997 story “Había una vez un río,” and Claribel Alegría’s 1983 poem “La mujer del Río Sumpul,” the traumatic events in the protagonists’ lives that occur in and near rivers create an inversion of the conventional use of rivers as symbols of life, purity, innocence, and re-creation by associating them with violence, death, and destruction. At the same time, the river often becomes a metaphor for the wounds of trauma, which allude to the psychological suffering not only of the protagonists, but to the collective pain of their countries torn asunder by war. Arturo Arias’s 2015 novel El precio del consuelo also features a river as the site of state-sponsored violence against rural citizens during the civil war period. In contrast with Bencastro’s and Alegria’s texts, however, Arias’s novel highlights issues of environmental justice related to the use of rivers in Central America that continue to plague the region to date. In the present essay, I argue that these works are compelling representations of the ways in which rivers have become sites of contestation between colonial and decolonial forces in Central America.
在《浑水:拉丁美洲想象中的河流》(2013)的引言中,伊丽莎白·佩蒂纳罗利和安娜·María穆蒂斯认为,拉丁美洲文学中的河流构成了“文学探索权力、身份、抵抗和不满问题的场所”。许多在20世纪70年代和80年代中美洲内战期间和关于中美洲内战的见证文学和抵抗文学作品,作为谴责和抵抗各种形式压迫的手段,支持了他们的论点。在2004年由路易斯·曼多基导演的电影《无辜的声音》、马里奥·本卡斯特罗1997年的故事《Había una vez un río》和克拉贝尔Alegría 1983年的诗歌《La mujer del Río Sumpul》中,主人公生活中的创伤事件发生在河流中和河流附近,通过将河流与暴力、死亡和破坏联系起来,将河流作为生命、纯洁、纯真和再创造的象征,这与传统意义上的河流的使用形成了一种逆转。与此同时,这条河经常成为创伤的隐喻,不仅暗指主人公的心理痛苦,还暗指被战争撕裂的国家的集体痛苦。阿图罗·阿里亚斯(Arturo Arias) 2015年的小说《El precio del consuelo》也描绘了一条河流,它是内战时期国家支持的针对农村居民的暴力场所。然而,与本卡斯特罗和阿莱格里亚的文本相比,阿里亚斯的小说强调了与中美洲河流使用有关的环境正义问题,这些问题至今仍在困扰着该地区。在本文中,我认为这些作品令人信服地展示了河流如何成为中美洲殖民和非殖民势力之间争论的场所。