Comparison of Ketamine and Fentanyl with Propofol for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia for Dilatation and Curettage

R. Ershad, Mozaffor Hossain, A. Maruf, S. Nazrina
{"title":"Comparison of Ketamine and Fentanyl with Propofol for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia for Dilatation and Curettage","authors":"R. Ershad, Mozaffor Hossain, A. Maruf, S. Nazrina","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v30i1.65312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Dilatation and curettage (D&C) is a common procedure that generally causes considerable pain and usually done under procedural sedation and analgesia. Propofol is an ideal intravenous anaesthtic agent for short interventional procedure like D&C but lack of analgesia remains it’s main shortcoming therefore it is always combined with an analgesic. Ketamine and fentanyl are the popular analgesic in this context.\nObjectives: This prospective clinical study was designed to evaluate to compare propofol ketamine combination versus propofol fentanyl combination in respect of hemodynamics and recovery time for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing D&C.\nMethods: This prospective randomized study was performed on 100 patients who underwent elective D&C procedure. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups of fifty each: group PK received propofol 2mg/kg + ketamine 1mg/kg for induction and propofol 4mg/kg/hr + ketamine 1 mg/kg/hr for maintenance anesthesia, group PF received propofol 2 mg/kg + fentanyl 2 ìg/kg for induction and propofol 4 mg/kg/hr + fentanyl 1ìg/kg/hr for maintenance of anesthesia. The pulse rate, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures and peripheral oxygen saturation were recorded. Recovery times, side effects of sedation were also recorded.\nResults: Demographic data were found similar in two groups. There were no significant differences in heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure in all time intervals among groups except there was statistically significant fall in systolic blood pressure after induction in PF group (P=0.005). Recovery time was statistically significant increase in Group PK compared to Group PF (p=0.004). There were no significant differences among groups in regard to side effects.\nConclusion: Propofol ketamine and propofol fentanyl had similar hemodynamic stability without any important side effects for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients underwent D&C but propofol ketamine had longer recovery time.\n JBSA 2017; 30(1): 14-20","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v30i1.65312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dilatation and curettage (D&C) is a common procedure that generally causes considerable pain and usually done under procedural sedation and analgesia. Propofol is an ideal intravenous anaesthtic agent for short interventional procedure like D&C but lack of analgesia remains it’s main shortcoming therefore it is always combined with an analgesic. Ketamine and fentanyl are the popular analgesic in this context. Objectives: This prospective clinical study was designed to evaluate to compare propofol ketamine combination versus propofol fentanyl combination in respect of hemodynamics and recovery time for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing D&C. Methods: This prospective randomized study was performed on 100 patients who underwent elective D&C procedure. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups of fifty each: group PK received propofol 2mg/kg + ketamine 1mg/kg for induction and propofol 4mg/kg/hr + ketamine 1 mg/kg/hr for maintenance anesthesia, group PF received propofol 2 mg/kg + fentanyl 2 ìg/kg for induction and propofol 4 mg/kg/hr + fentanyl 1ìg/kg/hr for maintenance of anesthesia. The pulse rate, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressures and peripheral oxygen saturation were recorded. Recovery times, side effects of sedation were also recorded. Results: Demographic data were found similar in two groups. There were no significant differences in heart rate, systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure in all time intervals among groups except there was statistically significant fall in systolic blood pressure after induction in PF group (P=0.005). Recovery time was statistically significant increase in Group PK compared to Group PF (p=0.004). There were no significant differences among groups in regard to side effects. Conclusion: Propofol ketamine and propofol fentanyl had similar hemodynamic stability without any important side effects for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients underwent D&C but propofol ketamine had longer recovery time.  JBSA 2017; 30(1): 14-20
氯胺酮、芬太尼与异丙酚用于扩张刮除术镇静镇痛的比较
扩张刮刮术(D&C)是一种常见的手术,通常会引起相当大的疼痛,通常在镇静和镇痛的情况下进行。异丙酚是D&C等短期介入手术中理想的静脉麻醉药,但其主要缺点是缺乏镇痛作用,因此常与镇痛药联用。在这种情况下,氯胺酮和芬太尼是常用的镇痛药。目的:本前瞻性临床研究旨在评价丙泊酚氯胺酮联合用药与丙泊酚芬太尼联合用药对D&C患者手术镇静镇痛的血流动力学和恢复时间的影响。方法:这项前瞻性随机研究对100例接受择期D&C手术的患者进行。将患者随机分为两组,每组50例:PK组采用丙泊酚2mg/kg +氯胺酮1mg/kg诱导,丙泊酚4mg/kg/hr +氯胺酮1mg/kg /hr维持麻醉,PF组采用丙泊酚2mg/kg +芬太尼2 ìg/kg诱导,丙泊酚4mg/kg/hr +芬太尼1ìg/kg/hr维持麻醉。记录脉搏率、收缩压、舒张压及外周血氧饱和度。同时记录镇静的恢复时间和副作用。结果:两组人口统计学数据相似。各组心率、收缩压、舒张压各时间间隔差异无统计学意义(P=0.005),但PF组诱导后收缩压下降有统计学意义(P=0.005)。与PF组相比,PK组恢复时间有统计学意义(p=0.004)。在副作用方面各组之间没有显著差异。结论:异丙酚氯胺酮与异丙酚芬太尼在D&C患者的手术镇静镇痛中具有相似的血流动力学稳定性,且无明显副作用,但异丙酚氯胺酮的恢复时间较长。JBSA 2017;30(1): 14到20
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信