Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: validation of a high performance liquid chromatography method and comparison with an ARK immunoassay

S. Blanco-Dorado, M. D. Bellés Medall, Ó. Pascual-Marmaneu, M. Campos‐Toimil, F. Otero-Espinar, Rafael Rodríguez-Riego, T. Rodríguez-Jato, I. Zarra-Ferro, M. Lamas, A. Fernández-Ferreiro
{"title":"Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole: validation of a high performance liquid chromatography method and comparison with an ARK immunoassay","authors":"S. Blanco-Dorado, M. D. Bellés Medall, Ó. Pascual-Marmaneu, M. Campos‐Toimil, F. Otero-Espinar, Rafael Rodríguez-Riego, T. Rodríguez-Jato, I. Zarra-Ferro, M. Lamas, A. Fernández-Ferreiro","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Voriconazole is an antifungal agent used in the treatment of aspergillosis and fluconazole-resistant Candida infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of voriconazole is recommended to optimise clinical results. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for measuring voriconazole in human serum, and comparison with an ARK immunoassay method. Methods Linearity, precision, accuracy and stability of the HPLC method were validated according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. The method was applied to the analysis of 58 trough serum samples from patients treated with voriconazole, and the HPLC-UV (ultraviolet) method was compared with an ARK immunoassay. The correlation of both methods was studied by the Pearson regression coefficient and the concordance of the values was evaluated by the Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok methods. Results All validation parameters met the criteria set out in the FDA and EMA guidelines. The standard curve was linear over a concentration range of 0.25–16 µg/mL with a limit of quantification of 0.125 µg/mL. No interactions between voriconazole and other drugs was observed and voriconazole was stable after 1 month at −80°C. Comparison of the HPLC method and the enzyme immunoassay method showed a linear correlation with a systematic error of −0.61 µg/mL between both methods. Conclusion The method developed is simple and fast and can be easily applied for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole. The HPLC-UV method was more sensitive than the immunoassay method and there was concordance with the immunoassay. Consequently both methods could be used, considering the correlation between them.","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"34 1","pages":"154 - 159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective Voriconazole is an antifungal agent used in the treatment of aspergillosis and fluconazole-resistant Candida infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of voriconazole is recommended to optimise clinical results. The aim of this study was the development and validation of a high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for measuring voriconazole in human serum, and comparison with an ARK immunoassay method. Methods Linearity, precision, accuracy and stability of the HPLC method were validated according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. The method was applied to the analysis of 58 trough serum samples from patients treated with voriconazole, and the HPLC-UV (ultraviolet) method was compared with an ARK immunoassay. The correlation of both methods was studied by the Pearson regression coefficient and the concordance of the values was evaluated by the Bland-Altman and Passing-Bablok methods. Results All validation parameters met the criteria set out in the FDA and EMA guidelines. The standard curve was linear over a concentration range of 0.25–16 µg/mL with a limit of quantification of 0.125 µg/mL. No interactions between voriconazole and other drugs was observed and voriconazole was stable after 1 month at −80°C. Comparison of the HPLC method and the enzyme immunoassay method showed a linear correlation with a systematic error of −0.61 µg/mL between both methods. Conclusion The method developed is simple and fast and can be easily applied for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole. The HPLC-UV method was more sensitive than the immunoassay method and there was concordance with the immunoassay. Consequently both methods could be used, considering the correlation between them.
伏立康唑的治疗药物监测:高效液相色谱法的验证及与ARK免疫分析法的比较
目的伏立康唑是一种治疗曲霉病和耐氟康唑念珠菌感染的抗真菌药物。建议伏立康唑的治疗药物监测(TDM)以优化临床结果。本研究的目的是建立和验证一种高效液相色谱(HPLC)测定人血清中伏立康唑的方法,并与ARK免疫分析法进行比较。方法按照美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的指导方针,对HPLC法的线性度、精密度、准确度和稳定性进行验证。将该方法应用于伏立康唑治疗的58例谷血清样本的分析,并与ARK免疫分析法进行比较。采用Pearson回归系数研究两种方法的相关性,并采用Bland-Altman和Passing-Bablok方法评价两种方法的一致性。结果所有验证参数均符合FDA和EMA指南中规定的标准。标准曲线在0.25 ~ 16µg/mL范围内呈线性,定量限为0.125µg/mL。伏立康唑与其他药物无相互作用,伏立康唑在−80℃下放置1个月后保持稳定。HPLC法与酶免疫法比较,两种方法的系统误差均为- 0.61µg/mL,线性相关。结论该方法简便、快速,可用于伏立康唑的常规治疗药物监测。HPLC-UV法灵敏度高于免疫分析法,且与免疫分析法结果一致。因此,考虑到它们之间的相关性,这两种方法都可以使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信