Increasing research output and impact through publication of DClinPsy research activity at the University of Hertfordshire

Q4 Psychology
I. Avery, J. Heath
{"title":"Increasing research output and impact through publication of DClinPsy research activity at the University of Hertfordshire","authors":"I. Avery, J. Heath","doi":"10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.366.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study considers research published by staff and trainee clinical psychologists from the University of Hertfordshire (UH) Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (DClinPsy) programme. This was done to reflect on which group is most often the first author, where the work is published, and the impact potential of this research output.The study employed both quantitative and qualitative enquiry. The quantitative aspect of the study provided descriptive information regarding known publications between January 2015 and October 2022. The qualitative aspect of the study used a questionnaire to find out about dissemination experiences of alumni. The programme prodnced 166 publications during the time period evaluated, an average of 20.8 publications per year. ‘Original Articles’ were the most popular type of publication, with a mean jonenal impact factor of 2.322. Trainee clinical psychologists were most often the first author on publications.The findings show production of research output via publications within journals that, on average, have an impact factor in line with the top 40–60 per cent of psychology journals. The level of output should continue to grow as a result of the increase in commissioned training places. However, there is more that the programme can do to support quality academic dissemination and recommendations for programme development are made. Trainee’s experiences and recommendations for future aspiring publishers are considered as well as a critique of the study itself.","PeriodicalId":39686,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Forum","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpf.2023.1.366.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory study considers research published by staff and trainee clinical psychologists from the University of Hertfordshire (UH) Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (DClinPsy) programme. This was done to reflect on which group is most often the first author, where the work is published, and the impact potential of this research output.The study employed both quantitative and qualitative enquiry. The quantitative aspect of the study provided descriptive information regarding known publications between January 2015 and October 2022. The qualitative aspect of the study used a questionnaire to find out about dissemination experiences of alumni. The programme prodnced 166 publications during the time period evaluated, an average of 20.8 publications per year. ‘Original Articles’ were the most popular type of publication, with a mean jonenal impact factor of 2.322. Trainee clinical psychologists were most often the first author on publications.The findings show production of research output via publications within journals that, on average, have an impact factor in line with the top 40–60 per cent of psychology journals. The level of output should continue to grow as a result of the increase in commissioned training places. However, there is more that the programme can do to support quality academic dissemination and recommendations for programme development are made. Trainee’s experiences and recommendations for future aspiring publishers are considered as well as a critique of the study itself.
通过在赫特福德大学发表clinpsy博士研究活动,增加研究产出和影响
这项探索性研究考虑了赫特福德大学(UH)临床心理学博士(DClinPsy)项目的工作人员和实习临床心理学家发表的研究。这样做是为了反映哪个小组最经常是第一作者,工作发表在哪里,以及这项研究成果的影响潜力。这项研究同时采用了定量和定性调查。该研究的定量方面提供了2015年1月至2022年10月之间已知出版物的描述性信息。质性方面的研究采用问卷调查的方式来了解校友的传播经历。在评价所涉期间,方案出版了166份出版物,平均每年出版20.8份。“原创文章”是最受欢迎的出版物类型,其平均影响因子为2.322。实习临床心理学家通常是出版物的第一作者。研究结果显示,平均而言,通过期刊发表的研究成果的影响因子与排名前40 - 60%的心理学期刊相当。由于委托培训名额的增加,产出水平应会继续增长。但是,方案在支持高质量的学术传播方面还可以做得更多,并为方案发展提出了建议。学员的经验和对未来有抱负的出版商的建议,以及对研究本身的批评,都被考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Forum
Clinical Psychology Forum Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信