Travelling abroad and geopolitical preferences – case of Kharkiv, Dnipro and Mariupol, Ukraine

IF 1.3 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
O. Gnatiuk, K. Mezentsev, G. Pidgrushnyi
{"title":"Travelling abroad and geopolitical preferences – case of Kharkiv, Dnipro and Mariupol, Ukraine","authors":"O. Gnatiuk, K. Mezentsev, G. Pidgrushnyi","doi":"10.11143/fennia.117041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper investigates the relationship between travel abroad experience and individual geopolitical preferences in three geopolitical fault-line cities in the eastern part of Ukraine. Employing binary logistic regression as a principal research method, we show that travel experience to European countries positively correlates with pro-European attitudes and corresponds to weaker pro-Soviet sentiments. On the contrary, travel experience to Russia is associated with somewhat weaker support for European geopolitical and cultural integration but stronger pro-Soviet sentiments. Travel experience to Russia is less important predictor of geopolitical preferences than visiting European countries. Pro-European attitudes, compared with pro-Soviet sentiments, are much more interlinked with international travel experience. The data on bilateral travellers evidences that possible effect of visiting European countries basically neutralises the effect of visiting Russia in terms of impact on geopolitical preferences. Although the relationship between travel abroad experience and geopolitical preferences is similar in all three cities under investigation, certain variations between them may be explained by different economic, socio-cultural and institutional background. The revealed correlations seem to cover both direct causal effect of travel abroad on geopolitical preferences and a reverse causality, namely self-selection of destination country according to personal pre-existing geopolitical views. The importance of discovered relationships for the integration of Ukrainian society into European civilization project is apparent not only considering visa-free regime between Ukraine and the European Union (EU), but also in view of the Russian military invasion in 2022 as a cause of flows of refugees from Ukraine to Europe.","PeriodicalId":45082,"journal":{"name":"Fennia-International Journal of Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fennia-International Journal of Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11143/fennia.117041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper investigates the relationship between travel abroad experience and individual geopolitical preferences in three geopolitical fault-line cities in the eastern part of Ukraine. Employing binary logistic regression as a principal research method, we show that travel experience to European countries positively correlates with pro-European attitudes and corresponds to weaker pro-Soviet sentiments. On the contrary, travel experience to Russia is associated with somewhat weaker support for European geopolitical and cultural integration but stronger pro-Soviet sentiments. Travel experience to Russia is less important predictor of geopolitical preferences than visiting European countries. Pro-European attitudes, compared with pro-Soviet sentiments, are much more interlinked with international travel experience. The data on bilateral travellers evidences that possible effect of visiting European countries basically neutralises the effect of visiting Russia in terms of impact on geopolitical preferences. Although the relationship between travel abroad experience and geopolitical preferences is similar in all three cities under investigation, certain variations between them may be explained by different economic, socio-cultural and institutional background. The revealed correlations seem to cover both direct causal effect of travel abroad on geopolitical preferences and a reverse causality, namely self-selection of destination country according to personal pre-existing geopolitical views. The importance of discovered relationships for the integration of Ukrainian society into European civilization project is apparent not only considering visa-free regime between Ukraine and the European Union (EU), but also in view of the Russian military invasion in 2022 as a cause of flows of refugees from Ukraine to Europe.
出国旅游与地缘政治偏好——以乌克兰哈尔科夫、第聂伯罗和马里乌波尔为例
本文调查了乌克兰东部三个地缘政治断层线城市的出国旅游经历与个人地缘政治偏好之间的关系。采用二元逻辑回归作为主要研究方法,我们发现欧洲国家的旅游经历与亲欧态度呈正相关,并对应于较弱的亲苏情绪。相反,去俄罗斯旅行的经历与对欧洲地缘政治和文化一体化的支持程度有所减弱,但亲苏情绪更强有关。与欧洲国家相比,前往俄罗斯旅游的经历对地缘政治偏好的预测作用较小。与亲苏情绪相比,亲欧态度与国际旅行经历的联系更为紧密。双边旅行者的数据表明,就地缘政治偏好的影响而言,访问欧洲国家的可能影响基本上抵消了访问俄罗斯的影响。尽管在调查的所有三个城市中,出国旅行经历与地缘政治偏好之间的关系是相似的,但它们之间的某些差异可以由不同的经济、社会文化和体制背景来解释。所揭示的相关性似乎涵盖了出国旅游对地缘政治偏好的直接因果关系和反向因果关系,即根据个人已有的地缘政治观点自我选择目的地国家。不仅考虑到乌克兰与欧盟(EU)之间的免签证制度,而且考虑到俄罗斯在2022年的军事入侵是乌克兰难民流入欧洲的一个原因,发现乌克兰社会融入欧洲文明项目的关系的重要性是显而易见的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信