Evaluation on the Influence of the Timing of Twin Pregnancy Termination on the Outcome of Mother and Infants

Yuying Chen
{"title":"Evaluation on the Influence of the Timing of Twin Pregnancy Termination on the Outcome of Mother and Infants","authors":"Yuying Chen","doi":"10.30564/JAMS.V4I2.3035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To observe the maternal and infant outcomes of pregnant women with twins terminating their pregnancy at different timings.  Methods: Among the twin pregnant women admitted to our hospital from August 2019 to August 2020, 50 primiparous women who opted to terminate their pregnancies at 5 different timings of “34——34+6 weeks”, “35——35+6 weeks”, “36——36+6 weeks”, “37——37+6 weeks”, “38——38+6 weeks” were selected as the research subjects. According to the timing of pregnancy termination, they were divided into 5 groups, each with 10 cases of pregnant women, and the impact of the timing of pregnancy termination on the outcome of the mothers and infants were compared.  Results: The “37——37+6 weeks” group had the largest amount of postpartum hemorrhage, and the difference in Hb level before and after delivery was the largest. With the increase in gestational week, the weight of both large and small fetuses increased. In terms of neonatal diseases, the comparison between “34——34+6 weeks”, “35——35+6 weeks”, “36——36+6 weeks” and “37——37+6 weeks”, “38——38+6 weeks”, P<0.05, the comparison between “37——37+6 weeks” and “38——38+6 weeks”, P>0.05.  Conclusion: The extension of the gestational week of twin pregnancies has no effect on postpartum hemorrhage, but it can improve the outcome of infants.","PeriodicalId":14958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medicine Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medicine Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/JAMS.V4I2.3035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To observe the maternal and infant outcomes of pregnant women with twins terminating their pregnancy at different timings.  Methods: Among the twin pregnant women admitted to our hospital from August 2019 to August 2020, 50 primiparous women who opted to terminate their pregnancies at 5 different timings of “34——34+6 weeks”, “35——35+6 weeks”, “36——36+6 weeks”, “37——37+6 weeks”, “38——38+6 weeks” were selected as the research subjects. According to the timing of pregnancy termination, they were divided into 5 groups, each with 10 cases of pregnant women, and the impact of the timing of pregnancy termination on the outcome of the mothers and infants were compared.  Results: The “37——37+6 weeks” group had the largest amount of postpartum hemorrhage, and the difference in Hb level before and after delivery was the largest. With the increase in gestational week, the weight of both large and small fetuses increased. In terms of neonatal diseases, the comparison between “34——34+6 weeks”, “35——35+6 weeks”, “36——36+6 weeks” and “37——37+6 weeks”, “38——38+6 weeks”, P<0.05, the comparison between “37——37+6 weeks” and “38——38+6 weeks”, P>0.05.  Conclusion: The extension of the gestational week of twin pregnancies has no effect on postpartum hemorrhage, but it can improve the outcome of infants.
双胎妊娠终止时机对母婴结局影响的评价
目的:观察不同时间终止双胎妊娠的母婴结局。方法:选取2019年8月至2020年8月在我院住院的双胎妊娠妇女中选择“34—34+6周”、“35—35+6周”、“36—36+6周”、“37—37+6周”、“38—38+6周”5个不同时间终止妊娠的50例初产妇作为研究对象。根据终止妊娠的时机分为5组,每组10例孕妇,比较终止妊娠时机对母婴结局的影响。结果:“37—37+6周”组产后出血量最大,分娩前后Hb水平差异最大。随着孕周的增加,大胎和小胎的体重均增加。新生儿疾病方面,“34—34+6周”、“35—35+6周”、“36—36+6周”与“37—37+6周”、“38—38+6周”的比较,P<0.05;“37—37+6周”与“38—38+6周”的比较,P>0.05。结论:延长双胎妊娠周对产后出血无影响,但可改善新生儿结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信