A biomedical research permissions ontology: cognitive and knowledge representation considerations

J. Obeid, D. Gabriel, Iain A. Sanderson
{"title":"A biomedical research permissions ontology: cognitive and knowledge representation considerations","authors":"J. Obeid, D. Gabriel, Iain A. Sanderson","doi":"10.1145/1920320.1920322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In designing a comprehensive mechanism for managing informed consents and permissions for biomedical research involving human participants, a significant effort is dedicated to the development of standardized classification of these consents and permissions. In this paper, we describe the considerations and implications of this effort that should be addressed during the development of a Biomedical Research Permissions Ontology (RPO). It is hoped that this standardization will allow disparate research institutions to pool research data and associated consents and permissions in order to facilitate collaborative translational research projects across multiple institutions and subsequent new breakthroughs in medicine while providing: 1) essential built in protections for privacy and confidentiality of research participants and 2) a mechanism for insuring that researchers adhere to patient's intent whether to participate in research or not.","PeriodicalId":91387,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings, Governance of technology, information and policies : addressing the challenges of worldwide interconnectivity. Workshop on Governance of Technology, Information and Policies (2010 : Austin, Tex.)","volume":"40 1","pages":"9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings, Governance of technology, information and policies : addressing the challenges of worldwide interconnectivity. Workshop on Governance of Technology, Information and Policies (2010 : Austin, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1920320.1920322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In designing a comprehensive mechanism for managing informed consents and permissions for biomedical research involving human participants, a significant effort is dedicated to the development of standardized classification of these consents and permissions. In this paper, we describe the considerations and implications of this effort that should be addressed during the development of a Biomedical Research Permissions Ontology (RPO). It is hoped that this standardization will allow disparate research institutions to pool research data and associated consents and permissions in order to facilitate collaborative translational research projects across multiple institutions and subsequent new breakthroughs in medicine while providing: 1) essential built in protections for privacy and confidentiality of research participants and 2) a mechanism for insuring that researchers adhere to patient's intent whether to participate in research or not.
生物医学研究许可本体:认知和知识表示的考虑
在设计一个全面的机制来管理涉及人类参与者的生物医学研究的知情同意和许可时,一个重要的努力是致力于开发这些同意和许可的标准化分类。在本文中,我们描述了在开发生物医学研究许可本体(RPO)期间应该解决的这项工作的考虑和影响。希望这一标准化将允许不同的研究机构汇集研究数据和相关的同意和许可,以促进跨多个机构的合作转化研究项目和随后的医学新突破,同时提供:1)对研究参与者的隐私和机密性进行必要的保护,2)确保研究人员无论是否参与研究都遵守患者意图的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信