The Primary Education System in Imperial Austria: Vice or Virtue? A Review of Schooling under Control by Tomáš Cvrček

IF 0.3 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Gabriele Cappelli
{"title":"The Primary Education System in Imperial Austria: Vice or Virtue? A Review of Schooling under Control by Tomáš Cvrček","authors":"Gabriele Cappelli","doi":"10.1080/14790963.2020.1893589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schooling under control, written by Tomáš Cvrček, is an ambitious and stimulating book. It offers a quantitative reconstruction of the diffusion of mass education in Imperial Austria, from the landmark Theresian school reform (1774) up to the liberal school reform passed in 1869. The evolution of the school system and of primary education is analysed through a variety of dimensions: the institutional foundations of the system (chapter 1), the quantitative expansion of enrolments and attendance (chapter 2), the financing (chapter 3), the teachers (chapter 4), and the pupils (chapter 5). Chapter 6 includes an aspect that is often neglected in this type of studies, which is a focus on the quality of education provided – meaning whether more schooling led to more actual learning. Chapter 7 then explains the way that the Liberal school reform of 1869 came into place. Such broad issues are, in turn, further dissected into other dimensions, like gender educational inequality, differences in schooling across different linguistic groups, and the rural-urban divide, among others. This impressive research effort, which involves thorough quantitative as well as qualitative analysis, is sustained by an extensive knowledge of the subject and of the literature and historiography on schooling reforms within Imperial Austria. Indeed, one of the main declared goals of the book is to challenge existing views on the legislation that first introduced mass education in this area of Central and Eastern Europe. While previous scholars, Cvrček maintains, have seen the 1774 legislation as a landmark reform that gave a decisive impulse to the rise of mass education in Austria, the data and evidence presented in the book show that the Theresian reform – far from prompting an abrupt acceleration in primary-schooling rates – actually held back the development of a modern school system in the region. The author clearly possesses in-depth understanding of the subject and commands the relevant literature within both history and economics. Given its aims, the book mainly targets historians of education who have focused on the political history of the Theresian reform and assumed that mass education would not have taken off without this legislation. The author, instead, argues that the development of mass education was mainly demand-driven during the century analysed within the","PeriodicalId":41396,"journal":{"name":"Central Europe","volume":"23 1","pages":"122 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14790963.2020.1893589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schooling under control, written by Tomáš Cvrček, is an ambitious and stimulating book. It offers a quantitative reconstruction of the diffusion of mass education in Imperial Austria, from the landmark Theresian school reform (1774) up to the liberal school reform passed in 1869. The evolution of the school system and of primary education is analysed through a variety of dimensions: the institutional foundations of the system (chapter 1), the quantitative expansion of enrolments and attendance (chapter 2), the financing (chapter 3), the teachers (chapter 4), and the pupils (chapter 5). Chapter 6 includes an aspect that is often neglected in this type of studies, which is a focus on the quality of education provided – meaning whether more schooling led to more actual learning. Chapter 7 then explains the way that the Liberal school reform of 1869 came into place. Such broad issues are, in turn, further dissected into other dimensions, like gender educational inequality, differences in schooling across different linguistic groups, and the rural-urban divide, among others. This impressive research effort, which involves thorough quantitative as well as qualitative analysis, is sustained by an extensive knowledge of the subject and of the literature and historiography on schooling reforms within Imperial Austria. Indeed, one of the main declared goals of the book is to challenge existing views on the legislation that first introduced mass education in this area of Central and Eastern Europe. While previous scholars, Cvrček maintains, have seen the 1774 legislation as a landmark reform that gave a decisive impulse to the rise of mass education in Austria, the data and evidence presented in the book show that the Theresian reform – far from prompting an abrupt acceleration in primary-schooling rates – actually held back the development of a modern school system in the region. The author clearly possesses in-depth understanding of the subject and commands the relevant literature within both history and economics. Given its aims, the book mainly targets historians of education who have focused on the political history of the Theresian reform and assumed that mass education would not have taken off without this legislation. The author, instead, argues that the development of mass education was mainly demand-driven during the century analysed within the
奥地利帝国的初等教育制度:恶还是善?《控制下的学校教育述评》Tomáš cvr ek
由Tomáš cvr ek撰写的《受控的学校教育》是一本雄心勃勃、令人振奋的书。它提供了一个定量重建大众教育在奥地利帝国的传播,从具有里程碑意义的特里西亚学校改革(1774)到1869年通过的自由主义学校改革。学校制度和初等教育的演变通过不同的维度进行分析:该系统的制度基础(第1章),入学人数和出勤率的数量扩张(第2章),融资(第3章),教师(第4章)和学生(第5章)。第6章包括在这类研究中经常被忽视的一个方面,即关注所提供的教育质量-意味着更多的学校教育是否导致更多的实际学习。第七章解释了1869年的自由主义学校改革是如何实施的。这些广泛的问题又被进一步剖析为其他维度,如性别教育不平等、不同语言群体的学校教育差异、城乡差距等。这项令人印象深刻的研究工作,包括彻底的定量和定性分析,是由广泛的主题知识和文学和历史编纂在奥地利帝国的学校改革。事实上,这本书宣称的主要目标之一是挑战对立法的现有观点,立法最初在中欧和东欧这一地区引入了大众教育。cvr埃克认为,虽然以前的学者认为1774年的立法是一个具有里程碑意义的改革,对奥地利大众教育的兴起起了决定性的推动作用,但书中提供的数据和证据表明,特拉西斯改革——远没有促使小学入学率的突然加速——实际上阻碍了该地区现代学校系统的发展。作者显然对这一主题有着深刻的理解,并掌握了历史和经济领域的相关文献。鉴于其目的,这本书主要针对教育历史学家,他们专注于Theresian改革的政治史,并认为如果没有这项立法,大众教育就不会起飞。相反,作者认为,大众教育的发展主要是需求驱动的世纪内分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central Europe
Central Europe HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Central Europe publishes original research articles on the history, languages, literature, political culture, music, arts and society of those lands once part of the Habsburg Monarchy and Poland-Lithuania from the Middle Ages to the present. It also publishes discussion papers, marginalia, book, archive, exhibition, music and film reviews. Central Europe has been established as a refereed journal to foster the worldwide study of the area and to provide a forum for the academic discussion of Central European life and institutions. From time to time an issue will be devoted to a particular theme, based on a selection of papers presented at an international conference or seminar series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信