The Prevalence of Bacteria, Fungi, Viruses, and Acanthamoeba From 3,004 Cases of Keratitis, Endophthalmitis, and Conjunctivitis.

R. Kowalski, Shannon V Nayyar, E. Romanowski, R. Shanks, A. Mammen, D. Dhaliwal, V. Jhanji
{"title":"The Prevalence of Bacteria, Fungi, Viruses, and Acanthamoeba From 3,004 Cases of Keratitis, Endophthalmitis, and Conjunctivitis.","authors":"R. Kowalski, Shannon V Nayyar, E. Romanowski, R. Shanks, A. Mammen, D. Dhaliwal, V. Jhanji","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe definitive identification of ocular pathogens optimizes effective treatment. Although the types of ocular pathogens are known; there is less definitive information on the prevalence of causative infections including viruses, fungi, and protozoa, which is the focus of this retrospective laboratory review.\n\n\nMETHODS\nData used for laboratory certification were reviewed for the detection of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa, from patients with infectious keratitis, endophthalmitis, and conjunctivitis. The main outcome parameter was laboratory-positive ocular infection.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe distribution of infectious agents for keratitis (n=1,387) (2004-2018) was bacteria 72.1% (Staphylococcus aureus 20.3%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 18%, Streptococcus spp. 8.5%, other gram-positives 12.4%, and other gram-negatives 12.9%), Herpes simplex virus 16%, fungi 6.7%, and Acanthamoeba 5.2%. For endophthalmitis, (n=770) (1993-2018), the bacterial distribution was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 54%, Streptococcus spp. 21%, S. aureus 10%, other gram-positives 8%, and gram-negatives 7%. The distribution for conjunctivitis (n=847) (2004-2018) was Adenovirus 34%, S. aureus 25.5%, Streptococcus pneumoniae 9%, Haemophilus 9%, other gram-negatives 8.8%, other gram-positives 6%, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 4.5% and Chlamydia 3.2%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nAn updated monitoring of ocular pathogens creates an awareness of the different infectious etiologies and the importance of laboratory studies. This information can determine treatment needs for infectious ocular diseases.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

PURPOSE The definitive identification of ocular pathogens optimizes effective treatment. Although the types of ocular pathogens are known; there is less definitive information on the prevalence of causative infections including viruses, fungi, and protozoa, which is the focus of this retrospective laboratory review. METHODS Data used for laboratory certification were reviewed for the detection of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa, from patients with infectious keratitis, endophthalmitis, and conjunctivitis. The main outcome parameter was laboratory-positive ocular infection. RESULTS The distribution of infectious agents for keratitis (n=1,387) (2004-2018) was bacteria 72.1% (Staphylococcus aureus 20.3%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 18%, Streptococcus spp. 8.5%, other gram-positives 12.4%, and other gram-negatives 12.9%), Herpes simplex virus 16%, fungi 6.7%, and Acanthamoeba 5.2%. For endophthalmitis, (n=770) (1993-2018), the bacterial distribution was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 54%, Streptococcus spp. 21%, S. aureus 10%, other gram-positives 8%, and gram-negatives 7%. The distribution for conjunctivitis (n=847) (2004-2018) was Adenovirus 34%, S. aureus 25.5%, Streptococcus pneumoniae 9%, Haemophilus 9%, other gram-negatives 8.8%, other gram-positives 6%, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus 4.5% and Chlamydia 3.2%. CONCLUSION An updated monitoring of ocular pathogens creates an awareness of the different infectious etiologies and the importance of laboratory studies. This information can determine treatment needs for infectious ocular diseases.
3004例角膜炎、眼内炎和结膜炎中细菌、真菌、病毒和棘阿米巴的流行
目的明确眼部病原菌的鉴定有助于有效治疗。虽然眼部病原体的类型是已知的;关于包括病毒、真菌和原生动物在内的致病性感染流行率的明确信息较少,这是本回顾性实验室综述的重点。方法对感染性角膜炎、眼内炎和结膜炎患者的细菌、病毒、真菌和原生动物检测数据进行回顾性分析。主要结局参数为实验室阳性眼部感染。结果2004-2018年角膜炎感染原分布为细菌72.1%(金黄色葡萄球菌20.3%、铜绿假单胞菌18%、链球菌8.5%、其他革兰氏阳性12.4%、其他革兰氏阴性12.9%)、单纯疱疹病毒16%、真菌6.7%、棘阿米巴5.2%。1993-2018年,770例眼内炎的细菌分布为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌54%、链球菌21%、金黄色葡萄球菌10%、其他革兰氏阳性8%、革兰氏阴性7%。结膜炎(n=847)的分布为腺病毒34%、金黄色葡萄球菌25.5%、肺炎链球菌9%、嗜血杆菌9%、其他革兰氏阴性8.8%、其他革兰氏阳性6%、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌4.5%、衣原体3.2%。结论眼部病原体监测的更新使人们认识到不同的感染病因和实验室研究的重要性。这些信息可以确定感染性眼病的治疗需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信