Health Care Decision Making and Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Descriptive Survey

Rosann O'Dell, J. Leafman, G. Nehrenz, Dan Bustillos
{"title":"Health Care Decision Making and Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Descriptive Survey","authors":"Rosann O'Dell, J. Leafman, G. Nehrenz, Dan Bustillos","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2011.640654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intellectual disability occurs in approximately 7 to 8 million Americans. The literature demonstrates that this population experiences communication barriers and mischaracterization of abilities during health care encounters, raising ethical considerations regarding patient involvement in health care decisions. Yet, there has been limited research on the involvement of those with intellectual disability in health care decision making. This study examined perceptions of adults with intellectual disability related to involvement in health care decisions. Methods: A quantitative survey instrument was distributed to 120 organizations throughout the United States that provide services to individuals with intellectual disability; their participation was sought to share information about the survey with eligible individuals. Survey results were analyzed to determine the extent to which respondents experienced communication barriers, mischaracterization of abilities, and/or exclusion in health care decision making. Results: Nineteen adults aged 18 years or older completed the survey; the majority (63.2%) of respondents were female. A majority (57.9%) did not perceive communication barriers. In addition, most participants (63.2–78.9%) did not report mischaracterization of their abilities based on responses to questions examining this issue. Roughly 58% of participants felt they had control during physician appointments. Nearly half (47.4%) were either unsure or disagreed that they had control over their health care decisions. Discussion: Results of this study suggest communication and mischaracterization issues are present for this population at varying levels. This study also suggests that adults with intellectual disability are largely unsure of their inclusion in health care decisions. Ethical complexities and considerations warrant further research.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"61 1","pages":"13 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.640654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Intellectual disability occurs in approximately 7 to 8 million Americans. The literature demonstrates that this population experiences communication barriers and mischaracterization of abilities during health care encounters, raising ethical considerations regarding patient involvement in health care decisions. Yet, there has been limited research on the involvement of those with intellectual disability in health care decision making. This study examined perceptions of adults with intellectual disability related to involvement in health care decisions. Methods: A quantitative survey instrument was distributed to 120 organizations throughout the United States that provide services to individuals with intellectual disability; their participation was sought to share information about the survey with eligible individuals. Survey results were analyzed to determine the extent to which respondents experienced communication barriers, mischaracterization of abilities, and/or exclusion in health care decision making. Results: Nineteen adults aged 18 years or older completed the survey; the majority (63.2%) of respondents were female. A majority (57.9%) did not perceive communication barriers. In addition, most participants (63.2–78.9%) did not report mischaracterization of their abilities based on responses to questions examining this issue. Roughly 58% of participants felt they had control during physician appointments. Nearly half (47.4%) were either unsure or disagreed that they had control over their health care decisions. Discussion: Results of this study suggest communication and mischaracterization issues are present for this population at varying levels. This study also suggests that adults with intellectual disability are largely unsure of their inclusion in health care decisions. Ethical complexities and considerations warrant further research.
医疗保健决策与成人智障:一项描述性调查
背景:大约有七百万到八百万美国人患有智力残疾。文献表明,这一人口经历沟通障碍和能力的错误描述在卫生保健遭遇,提高伦理考虑有关患者参与卫生保健决策。然而,关于智力残疾者参与医疗保健决策的研究有限。本研究考察了智力残疾成人参与医疗保健决策的认知。方法:向全美120个为智障人士提供服务的机构发放定量调查工具;他们的参与是为了与符合条件的个人分享有关调查的信息。对调查结果进行分析,以确定受访者在卫生保健决策中遇到沟通障碍、能力描述错误和/或被排斥的程度。结果:19名18岁及以上的成年人完成了调查;大多数受访者(63.2%)为女性。大多数(57.9%)没有感觉到沟通障碍。此外,大多数参与者(63.2-78.9%)并没有根据对这个问题的回答错误地描述他们的能力。大约58%的参与者认为他们在预约医生时可以控制病情。近一半(47.4%)的人不确定或不同意他们可以控制自己的医疗保健决定。讨论:本研究结果表明,在不同程度上,该人群存在沟通和错误描述问题。这项研究还表明,智力残疾的成年人在很大程度上不确定他们是否被纳入医疗保健决策。伦理的复杂性和考虑需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信