Osama Salha, Majella Okeahialam, Siân Jones, Peter O'Donovan
{"title":"Outpatient microhysteroscopy: why does it fail?","authors":"Osama Salha, Majella Okeahialam, Siân Jones, Peter O'Donovan","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To assess the failure rate of diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope.</p><p>Design</p><p>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p>Setting</p><p>Outpatient hysteroscopy unit in a large district general hospital.</p><p>Sample</p><p>All patients who had a diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy during the study period.</p><p>Main outcome measures</p><p>Hysteroscopy was considered a failure when the uterine cavity was not accessible or when the view obtained was unsatisfactory.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 1976 patients were seen in the direct-access hysteroscopy unit between November 1994 and May 1999. The procedure was performed successfully in 1898 patients (96.1%) but failed in 78 patients (3.9%). Causes for failure included: cervical stenosis (<i>n</i> = 54; 67.9%), severe discomfort (<i>n</i> = 7; 8.9%), unsatisfactory view (<i>n</i> = 6; 2.6%), obesity (<i>n</i> = 5; 6.4%), large cervical polyp (<i>n</i> = 4; 5.1%) and vagal reaction (<i>n</i> = 2; 2.6%). Overall failure was more likely in postmenopausal (46/894; 5.1%) than in premenopausal patients (32/1082; 2.9%).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope is a simple, safe, effective and acceptable investigation. The most common reason for a failed outpatient microhysteroscopy was cervical stenosis particularly in postmenopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"167-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Objective
To assess the failure rate of diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope.
Design
Retrospective cohort analysis.
Setting
Outpatient hysteroscopy unit in a large district general hospital.
Sample
All patients who had a diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy during the study period.
Main outcome measures
Hysteroscopy was considered a failure when the uterine cavity was not accessible or when the view obtained was unsatisfactory.
Results
A total of 1976 patients were seen in the direct-access hysteroscopy unit between November 1994 and May 1999. The procedure was performed successfully in 1898 patients (96.1%) but failed in 78 patients (3.9%). Causes for failure included: cervical stenosis (n = 54; 67.9%), severe discomfort (n = 7; 8.9%), unsatisfactory view (n = 6; 2.6%), obesity (n = 5; 6.4%), large cervical polyp (n = 4; 5.1%) and vagal reaction (n = 2; 2.6%). Overall failure was more likely in postmenopausal (46/894; 5.1%) than in premenopausal patients (32/1082; 2.9%).
Conclusions
Diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope is a simple, safe, effective and acceptable investigation. The most common reason for a failed outpatient microhysteroscopy was cervical stenosis particularly in postmenopausal women.