Assessing the performance of MODIS and VIIRS active fire products in the monitoring of wildfires: a case study in Turkey

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
K. Coskuner
{"title":"Assessing the performance of MODIS and VIIRS active fire products in the monitoring of wildfires: a case study in Turkey","authors":"K. Coskuner","doi":"10.3832/ifor3754-015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MODIS and VIIRS fire products have been widely used to detect and monitor fire activity at a global scale, as they provide highly relevant information on fire events, on their spatial and seasonal trends. Although these products have some limitations in detecting fires in forested areas due to closed canopy and smoke, they have been widely used to monitor and assess forest fires in many scientific studies. This study analyzes the performance of MODIS (MCD14ML) and VIIRS S-NPP (VNP14IMG) active fire/hotspot products in fire detection in five different land cover types (closed and open forests, shrublands, herbaceous vegetation and croplands) and compares the results to the ground-based fire database from 2015 to end of the 2019 in Turkey. Detected fires with a confidence value above 30% (nominal and high confidence) were used in the study. The land cover was assessed using the European Space Agency (ESA) Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) Dynamic Land Cover Layers at 100 m resolution in the study area. The performance assessment of two fire/hotspot products were conducted in three fire size classes, namely: fire size <1 ha, 1 to 10 ha, and >10 ha in five different land cover types. The results indicated that the overall accuracy of MODIS ranged from 0.6% to 16.6% and VIIRS S-NPP ranged from 1.3% to 25.6% of all ground-based fires in five different land cover types. The detection rates increased as the fire size increased. This study indicates that some limitations still exist to use MODIS and VIIRS S-NPP active fire/hotspot data in the assessment of wildfires.","PeriodicalId":13323,"journal":{"name":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iforest - Biogeosciences and Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3754-015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

MODIS and VIIRS fire products have been widely used to detect and monitor fire activity at a global scale, as they provide highly relevant information on fire events, on their spatial and seasonal trends. Although these products have some limitations in detecting fires in forested areas due to closed canopy and smoke, they have been widely used to monitor and assess forest fires in many scientific studies. This study analyzes the performance of MODIS (MCD14ML) and VIIRS S-NPP (VNP14IMG) active fire/hotspot products in fire detection in five different land cover types (closed and open forests, shrublands, herbaceous vegetation and croplands) and compares the results to the ground-based fire database from 2015 to end of the 2019 in Turkey. Detected fires with a confidence value above 30% (nominal and high confidence) were used in the study. The land cover was assessed using the European Space Agency (ESA) Copernicus Global Land Service (CGLS) Dynamic Land Cover Layers at 100 m resolution in the study area. The performance assessment of two fire/hotspot products were conducted in three fire size classes, namely: fire size <1 ha, 1 to 10 ha, and >10 ha in five different land cover types. The results indicated that the overall accuracy of MODIS ranged from 0.6% to 16.6% and VIIRS S-NPP ranged from 1.3% to 25.6% of all ground-based fires in five different land cover types. The detection rates increased as the fire size increased. This study indicates that some limitations still exist to use MODIS and VIIRS S-NPP active fire/hotspot data in the assessment of wildfires.
评估MODIS和VIIRS活火产品在野火监测中的性能:土耳其的案例研究
MODIS和VIIRS火灾产品已广泛用于探测和监测全球范围内的火灾活动,因为它们提供了有关火灾事件及其空间和季节趋势的高度相关信息。尽管这些产品由于树冠封闭和烟雾的影响,在探测森林地区火灾方面存在一定的局限性,但在许多科学研究中,它们已被广泛用于监测和评估森林火灾。本研究分析了MODIS (MCD14ML)和VIIRS S-NPP (VNP14IMG)在土耳其5种不同土地覆盖类型(封闭和开放森林、灌丛、草本植被和农田)的活火/热点产品在火灾探测中的性能,并将结果与2015年至2019年底的地面火灾数据库进行了比较。研究中使用了置信度高于30%(名义置信度和高置信度)的探测火灾。利用欧洲空间局(ESA)哥白尼全球土地服务(CGLS) 100 m分辨率的动态土地覆盖层对研究区进行了土地覆盖评估。两种火/热点产品的性能评估分为三个火大小类别,即:五种不同土地覆盖类型的火大小10公顷。结果表明,MODIS和VIIRS S-NPP对5种不同土地覆盖类型的地面火灾的总体精度分别为0.6% ~ 16.6%和1.3% ~ 25.6%。检出率随着火灾规模的增加而增加。研究表明,利用MODIS和VIIRS S-NPP活火/热点数据进行野火评估仍存在一定的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal encompasses a broad range of research aspects concerning forest science: forest ecology, biodiversity/genetics and ecophysiology, silviculture, forest inventory and planning, forest protection and monitoring, forest harvesting, landscape ecology, forest history, wood technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信