Are mammography and palpation sufficient for breast cancer screening? A dissenting opinion.

L. Keith, J. Oleszczuk, M. Laguens
{"title":"Are mammography and palpation sufficient for breast cancer screening? A dissenting opinion.","authors":"L. Keith, J. Oleszczuk, M. Laguens","doi":"10.1089/152460902753473417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Breast cancer is an equal opportunity killer in that as many as 60%-70% of breast cancer patients have no obvious risk factor(s). Thus, the continued reliance on the importance of risk factors to initiate screening programs may inhibit further inquiry into better diagnostic and prognostic indicators. An extensive review of past and recent literature reveals that mammography is not an objective examination. Its use as a screening tool is facilitated among women 40 years old and older whose breast tissue is primarily fatty and provides better visualization. Younger women are not generally advised to use mammography because of its potentially hazardous effects associated with repeated use of radiation. More importantly, regardless of patient age, radiologists interpret mammograms, and different degrees of interpretation error exist for different radiologists as well as for the same radiologist performing the analysis after a period of time. Thus, the use of mammography as the sole screening tool does not provide patients or physicians with a sense of confidence about sensitivity and specificity. Further, recent enthusiasm to promote mammography screening may give women unrealistic expectations, leading them to falsely believe that a negative examination is assurance that cancer is not present in its earliest detectable stage. We propose to supplement the physical examination and mammography with a third screening modality based on thermal detection monitors. This is a noninvasive and nonradiogenic tool and might enable clinicians to provide patients with every opportunity for early diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":80044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health & gender-based medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/152460902753473417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Breast cancer is an equal opportunity killer in that as many as 60%-70% of breast cancer patients have no obvious risk factor(s). Thus, the continued reliance on the importance of risk factors to initiate screening programs may inhibit further inquiry into better diagnostic and prognostic indicators. An extensive review of past and recent literature reveals that mammography is not an objective examination. Its use as a screening tool is facilitated among women 40 years old and older whose breast tissue is primarily fatty and provides better visualization. Younger women are not generally advised to use mammography because of its potentially hazardous effects associated with repeated use of radiation. More importantly, regardless of patient age, radiologists interpret mammograms, and different degrees of interpretation error exist for different radiologists as well as for the same radiologist performing the analysis after a period of time. Thus, the use of mammography as the sole screening tool does not provide patients or physicians with a sense of confidence about sensitivity and specificity. Further, recent enthusiasm to promote mammography screening may give women unrealistic expectations, leading them to falsely believe that a negative examination is assurance that cancer is not present in its earliest detectable stage. We propose to supplement the physical examination and mammography with a third screening modality based on thermal detection monitors. This is a noninvasive and nonradiogenic tool and might enable clinicians to provide patients with every opportunity for early diagnosis.
乳房x光检查和触诊是否足以进行乳腺癌筛查?反对意见。
乳腺癌是一个机会均等的杀手,多达60%-70%的乳腺癌患者没有明显的危险因素。因此,继续依赖风险因素的重要性来启动筛查计划可能会阻碍对更好的诊断和预后指标的进一步研究。一个广泛的回顾过去和最近的文献表明,乳房x光检查不是一个客观的检查。它作为一种筛查工具,在40岁及以上的女性中使用,这些女性的乳房组织主要是脂肪,可以提供更好的可视化。年轻女性通常不建议使用乳房x光检查,因为它与重复使用辐射有关的潜在危险影响。更重要的是,无论患者的年龄如何,放射科医生对乳房x光片的解读,不同的放射科医生以及同一放射科医生在一段时间后进行分析,都存在不同程度的解读误差。因此,使用乳房x光检查作为唯一的筛查工具并不能给患者或医生提供对敏感性和特异性的信心。此外,最近提倡乳房x光检查的热情可能会给女性带来不切实际的期望,导致她们错误地认为阴性检查可以确保癌症没有出现在最早可检测到的阶段。我们建议用基于热检测监视器的第三种筛查方式来补充体格检查和乳房x光检查。这是一种非侵入性和非放射性基因的工具,可能使临床医生为患者提供早期诊断的每一个机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信