Effectiveness of Automated HandSanitation Unit (AHS) and Conventional Hand Sanitation Devices

Ranie B. Canlas, Pamela b. Licup, Dynah d. Soriano, Benigno p. Legamia, Reynaldo c. Nicdao
{"title":"Effectiveness of Automated HandSanitation Unit (AHS) and Conventional Hand Sanitation Devices","authors":"Ranie B. Canlas, Pamela b. Licup, Dynah d. Soriano, Benigno p. Legamia, Reynaldo c. Nicdao","doi":"10.7718/iamure.ijhe.v5i1.844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hand washing is the prime consideration of everyone when it comes to hand hygiene. Along with this, the study was conducted to compare the efficiency of the Automated Hand Sanitation (AHS) and the Conventional Hand Sanitation (CHS) devices used in hand washing. The researchers utilized descriptive and library research methods. In order to gather data, the researchers conducted observation, interview, and survey questionnaire. Both the AHS and CHS devices were tested and evaluated by selected respondents based on functionality, usability, reliability, performance and supportability or the FURPS Quality Model. To compare and determine the significant differences of the mean when grouped according to hand sanitation systems, t-test for independent samples was used. The results showed that there is significant difference on the evaluation made by the respondents after testing both the devices. Some of the respondents underwent swab collection on some areas of their hands after using both the devices which were subjected to laboratory testing to validate significant changes. The study concludes that the use of the AHS in promoting complete hand sanitation is more effective than using CHS devices. It is, therefore, recommended that the AHS be utilized in order to promote complete hand sanitation procedures.","PeriodicalId":75938,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health education","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7718/iamure.ijhe.v5i1.844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hand washing is the prime consideration of everyone when it comes to hand hygiene. Along with this, the study was conducted to compare the efficiency of the Automated Hand Sanitation (AHS) and the Conventional Hand Sanitation (CHS) devices used in hand washing. The researchers utilized descriptive and library research methods. In order to gather data, the researchers conducted observation, interview, and survey questionnaire. Both the AHS and CHS devices were tested and evaluated by selected respondents based on functionality, usability, reliability, performance and supportability or the FURPS Quality Model. To compare and determine the significant differences of the mean when grouped according to hand sanitation systems, t-test for independent samples was used. The results showed that there is significant difference on the evaluation made by the respondents after testing both the devices. Some of the respondents underwent swab collection on some areas of their hands after using both the devices which were subjected to laboratory testing to validate significant changes. The study concludes that the use of the AHS in promoting complete hand sanitation is more effective than using CHS devices. It is, therefore, recommended that the AHS be utilized in order to promote complete hand sanitation procedures.
自动手卫生装置(AHS)和传统手卫生装置的有效性
说到手卫生,洗手是每个人首要考虑的问题。与此同时,该研究还比较了用于洗手的自动洗手设备(AHS)和传统洗手设备(CHS)的效率。研究人员采用了描述性和图书馆研究法。为了收集数据,研究人员进行了观察、访谈和问卷调查。AHS和CHS设备都由选定的受访者根据功能、可用性、可靠性、性能和可支持性或FURPS质量模型进行测试和评估。为了比较和确定按手卫生系统分组时平均值的显著差异,使用了独立样本的t检验。结果显示,受访者在测试两种设备后的评价存在显著差异。一些受访者在使用这两种设备后,对他们手上的某些区域进行了棉签采集,并进行了实验室测试,以验证显着变化。该研究的结论是,在促进完全手部卫生方面使用AHS比使用CHS设备更有效。因此,建议利用AHS来促进完整的手部卫生程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信