Firms’ Financing Choices and Profitability in the For-Profit Education Industry: An Empirical Survey of Education Companies Listed on the NYSE and NASDAQ Stock Markets

A. Quintiliani
{"title":"Firms’ Financing Choices and Profitability in the For-Profit Education Industry: An Empirical Survey of Education Companies Listed on the NYSE and NASDAQ Stock Markets","authors":"A. Quintiliani","doi":"10.5430/afr.v9n2p46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study seeks to understand financing choices and its relationships with profitability of for-profit education companies listed on NASDAQ and NYSE. This study tests the hypothesis that knowledge-based firms with higher assets intangibility used less debt in their capital structures than capital-intensive firms with higher assets tangibility. Capital structure theory is a useful framework to explain research findings. Tests were conducted on a sample consisting of education companies and capital-intensive firms listed on NASDAQ and NYSE during the period 2000-2018. Data collected by Zacks Premium database were submitted to regression analysis. Findings suggest that capital-intensive firms have higher debt ratios than education companies. Also, this study finds existence of a strong inverse relationship between profitability and the amount of debt in the capital structure of capital-intensive firms while no such relationship was found between these two variables for the education companies. This study’s findings could provide valuable information to policymakers and investors to identify suitable financing policies in the for-profit education industry. Findings can also be useful to stimulate debate on the role of equity financing to supporting growth policies of for-profit education industry. This study attempts to fill the absence of empirical studies on financial policies of for-profit education firms. Contribution/ Originality : The main contribution of this study is that it will increase knowledge about funding able to sustain for-profit education firm's growth. Furthermore, this study tries to fill the lack of studies who investigate explicitly (empirically or theoretically) funding policies of for-profit education firms.","PeriodicalId":34570,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v9n2p46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study seeks to understand financing choices and its relationships with profitability of for-profit education companies listed on NASDAQ and NYSE. This study tests the hypothesis that knowledge-based firms with higher assets intangibility used less debt in their capital structures than capital-intensive firms with higher assets tangibility. Capital structure theory is a useful framework to explain research findings. Tests were conducted on a sample consisting of education companies and capital-intensive firms listed on NASDAQ and NYSE during the period 2000-2018. Data collected by Zacks Premium database were submitted to regression analysis. Findings suggest that capital-intensive firms have higher debt ratios than education companies. Also, this study finds existence of a strong inverse relationship between profitability and the amount of debt in the capital structure of capital-intensive firms while no such relationship was found between these two variables for the education companies. This study’s findings could provide valuable information to policymakers and investors to identify suitable financing policies in the for-profit education industry. Findings can also be useful to stimulate debate on the role of equity financing to supporting growth policies of for-profit education industry. This study attempts to fill the absence of empirical studies on financial policies of for-profit education firms. Contribution/ Originality : The main contribution of this study is that it will increase knowledge about funding able to sustain for-profit education firm's growth. Furthermore, this study tries to fill the lack of studies who investigate explicitly (empirically or theoretically) funding policies of for-profit education firms.
营利性教育行业企业融资选择与盈利能力:对纽约证交所和纳斯达克上市教育公司的实证调查
本研究旨在了解在纳斯达克和纽约证券交易所上市的营利性教育公司的融资选择及其与盈利能力的关系。本研究检验了资产无形性较高的知识型企业比资产有形性较高的资本密集型企业在资本结构中使用较少债务的假设。资本结构理论是解释研究结果的一个有用框架。以2000-2018年期间在纳斯达克和纽约证券交易所上市的教育公司和资本密集型公司为样本进行了测试。将Zacks Premium数据库收集的数据进行回归分析。研究结果表明,资本密集型企业的负债率高于教育企业。此外,本研究还发现资本密集型企业的资本结构中盈利能力与负债数量之间存在很强的负相关关系,而教育类企业的这两个变量之间没有这种关系。本研究结果可为决策者和投资者提供有价值的信息,以确定适合营利性教育行业的融资政策。研究结果也有助于激发关于股权融资在支持营利性教育行业增长政策中的作用的辩论。本研究试图填补盈利性教育企业财务政策实证研究的空白。贡献/独创性:本研究的主要贡献在于,它将增加关于维持营利性教育公司增长的资金的知识。此外,本研究试图填补明确(实证或理论)调查营利性教育公司资助政策的研究的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信