An Evaluation of Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles for Beneficial Reuse in Roadway Construction

J. Warner, T. Edil, S. Dean
{"title":"An Evaluation of Reclaimed Asphalt Shingles for Beneficial Reuse in Roadway Construction","authors":"J. Warner, T. Edil, S. Dean","doi":"10.1520/JAI103665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large-scale recycling and reuse application of scrap shingles would utilize an otherwise wasted resource while clearing landfill space and creating new business opportunities. One potential reuse application is the use of reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) as an additive or substitute for the earth materials typically used in the aggregate base (AB) and subbase (ASB) layers of roadway pavements. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical specifications of RAS, the effect of fly ash stabilization on RAS strength, and the practicality of the widespread implementation of RAS in the AB and ASB layers of roadway pavements. RAS, fly ash stabilized RAS (S-RAS), RAS-aggregate mixtures, and RAS-silt mixtures were evaluated for particle size characteristics, compaction characteristics, CA Bearing Ratio (CBR), unconfined compressive strength, and resilient modulus. According to the results of the testing protocol, unstabilized RAS is unsuitable as base material although RAS could potentially be used as subbase or general fill material. RAS-aggregate mixtures are suitable for use as subbase and are potentially suitable as base course in an unstabilized state; however, RAS-aggregate mixtures exhibited decreasing resilient modulus with increasing RAS content. Fly ash stabilized RAS (S-RAS) was less susceptible to penetrative deformation than unstabilized RAS, however, S-RAS was still highly susceptible to penetrative deformation when unpaved. Fly ash stabilization of RAS generally provided less improvement in resilient modulus compared to fly ash stabilized low-plasticity clays. This may be due to the high asphalt content of RAS particles and resulting diminishment in pozzolanic activity and/or the diminished particle interconnectedness for cementation. Other forms of stabilization, such as cold asphalt emulsion, may be more effective in strengthening RAS. Further evaluation of alternative stabilization methods and additional studies to evaluate the practicality of RAS in other geotechnical applications such as embankment fill, filter, and/or drainage material are recommended.","PeriodicalId":15057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astm International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astm International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI103665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

A large-scale recycling and reuse application of scrap shingles would utilize an otherwise wasted resource while clearing landfill space and creating new business opportunities. One potential reuse application is the use of reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) as an additive or substitute for the earth materials typically used in the aggregate base (AB) and subbase (ASB) layers of roadway pavements. The purpose of this study was to determine the technical specifications of RAS, the effect of fly ash stabilization on RAS strength, and the practicality of the widespread implementation of RAS in the AB and ASB layers of roadway pavements. RAS, fly ash stabilized RAS (S-RAS), RAS-aggregate mixtures, and RAS-silt mixtures were evaluated for particle size characteristics, compaction characteristics, CA Bearing Ratio (CBR), unconfined compressive strength, and resilient modulus. According to the results of the testing protocol, unstabilized RAS is unsuitable as base material although RAS could potentially be used as subbase or general fill material. RAS-aggregate mixtures are suitable for use as subbase and are potentially suitable as base course in an unstabilized state; however, RAS-aggregate mixtures exhibited decreasing resilient modulus with increasing RAS content. Fly ash stabilized RAS (S-RAS) was less susceptible to penetrative deformation than unstabilized RAS, however, S-RAS was still highly susceptible to penetrative deformation when unpaved. Fly ash stabilization of RAS generally provided less improvement in resilient modulus compared to fly ash stabilized low-plasticity clays. This may be due to the high asphalt content of RAS particles and resulting diminishment in pozzolanic activity and/or the diminished particle interconnectedness for cementation. Other forms of stabilization, such as cold asphalt emulsion, may be more effective in strengthening RAS. Further evaluation of alternative stabilization methods and additional studies to evaluate the practicality of RAS in other geotechnical applications such as embankment fill, filter, and/or drainage material are recommended.
再生沥青瓦在道路建设中的有益再利用评价
大规模回收和再利用废瓦将利用原本被浪费的资源,同时清理垃圾填埋场空间并创造新的商业机会。一种潜在的再利用应用是使用再生沥青瓦(RAS)作为通常用于道路路面的集料基层(AB)和基层(ASB)层的土材料的添加剂或替代品。本研究的目的是确定RAS的技术指标,粉煤灰稳定对RAS强度的影响,以及在道路路面AB层和ASB层广泛实施RAS的可行性。对RAS、粉煤灰稳定RAS (S-RAS)、RAS-骨料混合料和RAS-粉砂混合料的粒径特性、压实特性、CA承载比(CBR)、无侧限抗压强度和弹性模量进行了评估。根据试验方案的结果,不稳定的RAS虽然有可能用作亚基或一般填充材料,但不适合作为基材。ras -骨料混合物适合用作底基层,并且在不稳定状态下可能适合用作基层;随着RAS含量的增加,RAS-骨料混合料的弹性模量呈下降趋势。粉煤灰稳定RAS (S-RAS)比非稳定RAS (S-RAS)更不容易发生渗透变形,但在未铺装时,S-RAS对渗透变形的敏感性仍然很高。与粉煤灰稳定的低塑性粘土相比,粉煤灰稳定的RAS对弹性模量的改善幅度较小。这可能是由于RAS颗粒的沥青含量高,导致火山灰活性降低和/或胶结时颗粒互连性降低。其他形式的稳定剂,如冷沥青乳液,在加强RAS方面可能更有效。建议进一步评估其他稳定方法,并进一步研究RAS在其他岩土工程应用中的实用性,如路堤填充物、过滤器和/或排水材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信