Gender differences in predictors of anticipated divisions of household labor in Christian students

Catherine S. Chan, M. Hall, Tamara L. Anderson
{"title":"Gender differences in predictors of anticipated divisions of household labor in Christian students","authors":"Catherine S. Chan, M. Hall, Tamara L. Anderson","doi":"10.1037/e645342012-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender performance theory suggests the division of household labor is determined by threats to individuals' gender identity. This study explores gender identity threat among college students' expected division of household labor and whether sanctification of one's anticipated division of household labor moderates the relationship between gender identity threat and expected division of household labor. A sample of 126 participants was recruited from a Christian liberal arts university, 48 men and 78 women ranging in age from 18 to 36. Analyses indicated that gender identity threat led to a greater emphasis on stereotypically feminine tasks. Secondly, sanctification moderated the relationship between gender identity threat and expected division of household labor for men. Men who endorsed higher levels of sanctification of the division of household labor expected to divide household labor in a more traditional manner when their gender identity was threatened than when it was not threatened; the opposite pattern was true of men with low levels of sanctification. Although sanctification of the division of household labor was not a significant moderator for women, sanctification and gender identity threat together were found to significantly influence expected division of household labor, with greater sanctification related to more traditional anticipated division of labor.The factors leading to the division of household labor in marriage has been the subject of research for many years. Historically, the division of household labor has been influenced by factors such as the industrial revolution, which moved economic productivity out of the home and resulted in a split between household labor and economic productivity, with women taking on the larger part of household labor. In recent decades, research has documented the existence of gender divisions in the types of household labor performed (Berk & Berk 1979). Blair and Lichter (1991) divided household tasks into gender stereotypical categories based on data from the 1988 National Survey of Families and Households, which asked 3,190 married and cohabiting couples about their time spent on eight household chores. Women were found to spend more time preparing meals, washing dishes and cleaning up after meals, cleaning house, and washing, ironing, and mending clothes. Men were found to spend more time doing outdoor and household maintenance, and auto maintenance and repair. Men and women were found to spend a similar amount of time grocery shopping, and paying the bills. The present study explores how religiously-influenced views on household labor intersect with contemporary gender threat theory in predicting anticipated division of household labor in a sample of Christian undergraduate students.Past research focused on theories that explain the division of household labor based on external resources like time and money, with inconsistent results. However, more recently Brines (1994) and Greenstein (2000) introduced an alternative explanation for household division of labor: gender performance theory. Gender performance theory argues that the division of household labor is determined by efforts to maintain one's masculinity or femininity. As such, the theory suggests that an individual will perform the household tasks that would secure his or her identity as a man or woman. The gender performance process suggests that couples who stray from their stereotypical gender roles compensate for their role deviation by exaggerating stereotypical behaviors. When couples stray from their stereotypical gender roles their identity as a woman/wife or as a man/husband is threatened. To compensate for the deviation from the stereotype, they adjust their household behaviors to divide the chores in a more stereotypical manner. This theory is consistent with compensatory masculinity theory (Babl 1979), which states that men defensively exaggerate their masculinity when their sex-roles are threatened. …","PeriodicalId":16908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology and Christianity","volume":"64 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology and Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e645342012-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Gender performance theory suggests the division of household labor is determined by threats to individuals' gender identity. This study explores gender identity threat among college students' expected division of household labor and whether sanctification of one's anticipated division of household labor moderates the relationship between gender identity threat and expected division of household labor. A sample of 126 participants was recruited from a Christian liberal arts university, 48 men and 78 women ranging in age from 18 to 36. Analyses indicated that gender identity threat led to a greater emphasis on stereotypically feminine tasks. Secondly, sanctification moderated the relationship between gender identity threat and expected division of household labor for men. Men who endorsed higher levels of sanctification of the division of household labor expected to divide household labor in a more traditional manner when their gender identity was threatened than when it was not threatened; the opposite pattern was true of men with low levels of sanctification. Although sanctification of the division of household labor was not a significant moderator for women, sanctification and gender identity threat together were found to significantly influence expected division of household labor, with greater sanctification related to more traditional anticipated division of labor.The factors leading to the division of household labor in marriage has been the subject of research for many years. Historically, the division of household labor has been influenced by factors such as the industrial revolution, which moved economic productivity out of the home and resulted in a split between household labor and economic productivity, with women taking on the larger part of household labor. In recent decades, research has documented the existence of gender divisions in the types of household labor performed (Berk & Berk 1979). Blair and Lichter (1991) divided household tasks into gender stereotypical categories based on data from the 1988 National Survey of Families and Households, which asked 3,190 married and cohabiting couples about their time spent on eight household chores. Women were found to spend more time preparing meals, washing dishes and cleaning up after meals, cleaning house, and washing, ironing, and mending clothes. Men were found to spend more time doing outdoor and household maintenance, and auto maintenance and repair. Men and women were found to spend a similar amount of time grocery shopping, and paying the bills. The present study explores how religiously-influenced views on household labor intersect with contemporary gender threat theory in predicting anticipated division of household labor in a sample of Christian undergraduate students.Past research focused on theories that explain the division of household labor based on external resources like time and money, with inconsistent results. However, more recently Brines (1994) and Greenstein (2000) introduced an alternative explanation for household division of labor: gender performance theory. Gender performance theory argues that the division of household labor is determined by efforts to maintain one's masculinity or femininity. As such, the theory suggests that an individual will perform the household tasks that would secure his or her identity as a man or woman. The gender performance process suggests that couples who stray from their stereotypical gender roles compensate for their role deviation by exaggerating stereotypical behaviors. When couples stray from their stereotypical gender roles their identity as a woman/wife or as a man/husband is threatened. To compensate for the deviation from the stereotype, they adjust their household behaviors to divide the chores in a more stereotypical manner. This theory is consistent with compensatory masculinity theory (Babl 1979), which states that men defensively exaggerate their masculinity when their sex-roles are threatened. …
基督教学生预期家庭劳动分工预测因子的性别差异
性别表现理论认为,家庭劳动分工是由对个体性别认同的威胁决定的。本研究探讨性别认同威胁对大学生预期家务劳动分工的影响,以及预期家务劳动分工的圣化是否会调节性别认同威胁与预期家务劳动分工的关系。从一所基督教文科大学招募了126名参与者,其中48名男性和78名女性,年龄从18岁到36岁不等。分析表明,性别认同威胁导致人们更加重视刻板的女性任务。其次,圣化对性别认同威胁与男性预期家务分工的关系有调节作用。认为家务劳动分工更神圣的男性在其性别认同受到威胁时比在其性别认同没有受到威胁时更倾向于按传统方式分工;相反的情况发生在那些不那么圣洁的人身上。尽管对家务劳动分工的神圣化对女性来说不是一个显著的调节因素,但我们发现,神圣化和性别认同威胁一起显著影响了预期的家务劳动分工,更神圣化与更传统的预期劳动分工相关。导致婚姻中家庭劳动分工的因素一直是研究多年的课题。从历史上看,家务劳动的分工受到工业革命等因素的影响,工业革命将经济生产力从家庭中转移出来,导致家务劳动和经济生产力之间的分裂,妇女承担了大部分家务劳动。近几十年来,研究证明了在家务劳动类型中存在性别划分(Berk & Berk 1979)。布莱尔和利希特(1991)根据1988年全国家庭和家庭调查的数据,将家务划分为性别刻板印象的类别,该调查询问了3190对已婚和同居夫妇在八项家务上花费的时间。研究发现,女性花在做饭、洗碗、饭后打扫卫生、打扫房间、洗衣、熨烫和缝补衣服上的时间更多。研究发现,男性花在户外和家庭保养以及汽车保养和修理上的时间更多。研究发现,男性和女性花在购买食品杂货和支付账单上的时间相当。本研究以基督教大学生为样本,探讨受宗教影响的家务劳动观与当代性别威胁理论在预测预期家务劳动分工时的交集。过去的研究集中在解释基于时间和金钱等外部资源的家庭劳动分工的理论上,结果不一致。然而,最近Brines(1994)和Greenstein(2000)提出了家庭劳动分工的另一种解释:性别绩效理论。性别表现理论认为,家务劳动的分工是由维持男性气质或女性气质的努力决定的。因此,该理论认为,一个人会做家务,以确保他或她作为男人或女人的身份。性别表现过程表明,偏离刻板性别角色的夫妻通过夸大刻板行为来弥补他们的角色偏离。当夫妻偏离了他们固有的性别角色时,他们作为女人/妻子或男人/丈夫的身份就受到了威胁。为了弥补对刻板印象的偏离,他们调整了自己的家庭行为,以更刻板的方式分配家务。这一理论与补偿男子气概理论(Babl 1979)是一致的,该理论指出,当男性的性别角色受到威胁时,他们会防御性地夸大自己的男子气概。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信