Grice’s Theory of Implicature in the Philosophy of the Cosmos

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY
Yu. E. Fedorova, Nataliya Salnikiva
{"title":"Grice’s Theory of Implicature in the Philosophy of the Cosmos","authors":"Yu. E. Fedorova, Nataliya Salnikiva","doi":"10.29202/phil-cosm/23/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problem of communication between the earthly and unearthly mind. The authors contrasted Grice’s theory of implicature with the Philosophy of the Cosmos. As a result, it has been found that the use of Grice’s theory of implication at the scale of space exploration changes the meanings of the theory of implicature significantly. The opposition between Grice’s theory of implicature and the Philosophy of the Cosmos updates the question “How acceptable are the similarities of the histories of cosmic civilizations at admissibility of similarity of the key phases of the physical, chemical, biological, and neurobiological evolution?” The study has shown that in the scope of space exploration, the meanings of the key term “the history of the cosmic civilization” are changing, in the question posed. They are formalized. The formalization of the term “history of the cosmic civilization” means the concentration of information in it, which is limited by the stages of neuroevolution and its external manifestations — “techne” (in the initial, antique senses). Based on the results obtained, the authors examined Grice’s four maxims in space exploration and found their weak practical effect. It was proved that the basic Cooperative Principle, which was complemented by the Q and R Principles of Horn, effectively manifested itself in communication between space civilizations. The authors have concluded that 1) Grice’s theory of implicature confirms the truth of the Philosophy of the Cosmos; 2) the main provisions of the theory of implicature are not refuted, however, they are specified.","PeriodicalId":42240,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Cosmology-Filosofiya i Kosmologiya","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Cosmology-Filosofiya i Kosmologiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/23/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of communication between the earthly and unearthly mind. The authors contrasted Grice’s theory of implicature with the Philosophy of the Cosmos. As a result, it has been found that the use of Grice’s theory of implication at the scale of space exploration changes the meanings of the theory of implicature significantly. The opposition between Grice’s theory of implicature and the Philosophy of the Cosmos updates the question “How acceptable are the similarities of the histories of cosmic civilizations at admissibility of similarity of the key phases of the physical, chemical, biological, and neurobiological evolution?” The study has shown that in the scope of space exploration, the meanings of the key term “the history of the cosmic civilization” are changing, in the question posed. They are formalized. The formalization of the term “history of the cosmic civilization” means the concentration of information in it, which is limited by the stages of neuroevolution and its external manifestations — “techne” (in the initial, antique senses). Based on the results obtained, the authors examined Grice’s four maxims in space exploration and found their weak practical effect. It was proved that the basic Cooperative Principle, which was complemented by the Q and R Principles of Horn, effectively manifested itself in communication between space civilizations. The authors have concluded that 1) Grice’s theory of implicature confirms the truth of the Philosophy of the Cosmos; 2) the main provisions of the theory of implicature are not refuted, however, they are specified.
格赖斯在宇宙哲学中的含意理论
这篇文章致力于探讨尘世与非尘世心灵之间的交流问题。作者将格赖斯的含意理论与宇宙哲学进行了对比。结果发现,在空间探索的尺度上使用格赖斯的蕴涵理论会显著地改变蕴涵理论的意义。格赖斯的含意理论与宇宙哲学之间的对立更新了这个问题:“在物理、化学、生物和神经生物学进化的关键阶段的相似性的可接受程度上,宇宙文明历史的相似性有多大?”研究表明,在空间探索的范围内,“宇宙文明史”这一关键术语的含义在提出的问题中正在发生变化。它们是形式化的。“宇宙文明史”一词的形式化意味着其中信息的集中,这受到神经进化阶段及其外部表现形式——“技术”(在最初的、古老的感觉中)的限制。在此基础上,作者考察了格赖斯在太空探索中的四个格言,发现它们的实际效果很弱。实践证明,在空间文明交流中,以“合作原则”为基本原则,与“霍恩原则”和“霍恩原则”相辅相成,有效地体现了空间文明的交流。作者的结论是:1)格赖斯的含意理论证实了宇宙哲学的真理性;2)含意理论的主要条款没有被反驳,但是,它们被指定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信