Comparison between several multi-parameter seismic inversion methods in identifying plutonic igneous rocks

Yang Haijun , Xu Yongzhong , Huang Zhibin , Chen Shizhong , Yang Zhilin , Wu Gang , Xiao Zhongyao
{"title":"Comparison between several multi-parameter seismic inversion methods in identifying plutonic igneous rocks","authors":"Yang Haijun ,&nbsp;Xu Yongzhong ,&nbsp;Huang Zhibin ,&nbsp;Chen Shizhong ,&nbsp;Yang Zhilin ,&nbsp;Wu Gang ,&nbsp;Xiao Zhongyao","doi":"10.1016/j.mstc.2011.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the objective of establishing the necessary conditions for 3-D seismic data from a Permian plutonic oilfield in western China, we compared the technology of several multi-parameter seismic inversion methods in identifying igneous rocks. The most often used inversion methods are Constrained Sparse Spike Inversion (CSSI), Artificial Neural Network Inversion (ANN) and GR Pseudo-impedance Inversion. Through the application of a variety of inversion methods with log curves correction, we obtained relatively high-resolution impedance and velocity sections, effectively identifying the lithology of Permian igneous rocks and inferred lateral variation in the lithology of igneous rocks. By means of a comprehensive comparative study, we arrived at the following conclusions: the CSSI inversion has good waveform continuity, and the ANN inversion has lower resolution than the CSSI inversion. The inversion results show that multi-parameter seismic inversion methods are an effective solution to the identification of igneous rocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100930,"journal":{"name":"Mining Science and Technology (China)","volume":"21 3","pages":"Pages 325-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mstc.2011.05.023","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mining Science and Technology (China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S167452641100069X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

With the objective of establishing the necessary conditions for 3-D seismic data from a Permian plutonic oilfield in western China, we compared the technology of several multi-parameter seismic inversion methods in identifying igneous rocks. The most often used inversion methods are Constrained Sparse Spike Inversion (CSSI), Artificial Neural Network Inversion (ANN) and GR Pseudo-impedance Inversion. Through the application of a variety of inversion methods with log curves correction, we obtained relatively high-resolution impedance and velocity sections, effectively identifying the lithology of Permian igneous rocks and inferred lateral variation in the lithology of igneous rocks. By means of a comprehensive comparative study, we arrived at the following conclusions: the CSSI inversion has good waveform continuity, and the ANN inversion has lower resolution than the CSSI inversion. The inversion results show that multi-parameter seismic inversion methods are an effective solution to the identification of igneous rocks.

几种多参数地震反演方法识别深部火成岩的比较
摘要为建立中国西部某二叠系深部油田三维地震资料采集的必要条件,对几种多参数地震反演方法识别火成岩的技术进行了比较。最常用的反演方法有约束稀疏尖峰反演(CSSI)、人工神经网络反演(ANN)和GR伪阻抗反演。通过应用多种测井曲线校正反演方法,获得了相对高分辨率的阻抗和速度剖面,有效识别了二叠系火成岩岩性,并推断了火成岩岩性的横向变化。通过综合对比研究,我们得出以下结论:CSSI反演具有良好的波形连续性,ANN反演的分辨率低于CSSI反演。反演结果表明,多参数地震反演方法是火成岩识别的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信