Ramin Dabirian, A. Nababan, I. Gavrielatos, R. Mohan, O. Shoham
{"title":"Foam Breakup in CFC/GLCC© System","authors":"Ramin Dabirian, A. Nababan, I. Gavrielatos, R. Mohan, O. Shoham","doi":"10.1115/FEDSM2018-83315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foaming is a common phenomenon in the petroleum industry. Foams can be desirable for drilling applications, whereby the cutting bits are lubricated, and cuttings are carried up to the surface. However, foam can be undesirable for production operation, which hinders the gas-liquid separation process.\n Experimental investigation has been conducted on foam break-up in a standalone Churn Flow Coalescer (CFC), a standalone Gas Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone (GLCC©) and a combined CFC/GLCC© system. A 1-inch Foam Characterization Rig (FCR) is utilized. The FCR is equipped with a 3-inch diameter CFC, which is connected in series to a 2-inch diameter GLCC©. A total of 30 experimental runs are conducted for both Gas Mode (GM) and Liquid Mode (LM) operations. A surfactant (SI-403) with concentration of 0.025%, superficial liquid velocities of 0.1 and 0.15 m/s and superficial gas velocities of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 m/s are used in the experiments.\n The experimental results show that for the GM operation, the foam break-up in combined CFC/GLCC© system is more efficient than that in the standalone GLCC©, for the same flow conditions. Lowering the superficial gas velocity or increasing the superficial liquid velocity produce less stable foam, larger gas bubbles and lower half-life time. The outlet clear liquid flow rate (with no foam) under the LM operation increases with increasing superficial liquid velocity or decreasing superficial gas velocity. The recommended operational conditions for the CFC are at low superficial gas velocities, lower than the transition boundary to churn flow in the CFC.","PeriodicalId":23480,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Flow Manipulation and Active Control; Bio-Inspired Fluid Mechanics; Boundary Layer and High-Speed Flows; Fluids Engineering Education; Transport Phenomena in Energy Conversion and Mixing; Turbulent Flows; Vortex Dynamics; DNS/LES and Hybrid RANS/LES Methods; Fluid Structure Interaction; Fl","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Flow Manipulation and Active Control; Bio-Inspired Fluid Mechanics; Boundary Layer and High-Speed Flows; Fluids Engineering Education; Transport Phenomena in Energy Conversion and Mixing; Turbulent Flows; Vortex Dynamics; DNS/LES and Hybrid RANS/LES Methods; Fluid Structure Interaction; Fl","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/FEDSM2018-83315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
CFC/GLCC泡沫分解©System
起泡是石油工业中常见的现象。泡沫可以用于钻井应用,其中切削钻头被润滑,岩屑被带到地面。然而,泡沫在生产操作中是不可取的,它阻碍了气液分离过程。分别在独立搅拌流聚结器(CFC)、独立气液圆柱旋流器(GLCC©)和CFC/GLCC©组合系统中进行了泡沫破碎实验研究。使用1英寸泡沫表征仪(FCR)。FCR配备了直径3英寸的CFC,该CFC串联到直径2英寸的GLCC©上。总共进行了30次气体模式(GM)和液体模式(LM)的实验运行。表面活性剂SI-403的浓度为0.025%,表面液速分别为0.1和0.15 m/s,表面气速分别为0.5、1和1.5 m/s。实验结果表明,在相同的流量条件下,CFC/GLCC©联合系统在GM操作下的泡沫破碎效率高于单独GLCC©系统。降低表面气速或增加表面液速会使泡沫稳定性降低,气泡增大,半衰期缩短。LM操作下的出口清液流量(无泡沫)随浅液速度的增大或浅气速度的减小而增大。CFC的推荐运行条件是低表面气速,低于CFC中搅拌流的过渡边界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。