Identifying Design Problems in the Source Code: A Grounded Theory

L. Sousa, Anderson Oliveira, W. Oizumi, Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Alessandro F. Garcia, Jaejoon Lee, Marcos Kalinowski, R. Mello, B. Neto, R. Oliveira, C. Lucena, R. Paes
{"title":"Identifying Design Problems in the Source Code: A Grounded Theory","authors":"L. Sousa, Anderson Oliveira, W. Oizumi, Simone Diniz Junqueira Barbosa, Alessandro F. Garcia, Jaejoon Lee, Marcos Kalinowski, R. Mello, B. Neto, R. Oliveira, C. Lucena, R. Paes","doi":"10.1145/3180155.3180239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of design problems may cause re-engineering or even discontinuation of the system. Due to missing, informal or outdated design documentation, developers often have to rely on the source code to identify design problems. Therefore, developers have to analyze different symptoms that manifest in several code elements, which may quickly turn into a complex task. Although researchers have been investigating techniques to help developers in identifying design problems, there is little knowledge on how developers actually proceed to identify design problems. In order to tackle this problem, we conducted a multi-trial industrial experiment with professionals from 5 software companies to build a grounded theory. The resulting theory offers explanations on how developers identify design problems in practice. For instance, it reveals the characteristics of symptoms that developers consider helpful. Moreover, developers often combine different types of symptoms to identify a single design problem. This knowledge serves as a basis to further understand the phenomena and advance towards more effective identification techniques.","PeriodicalId":6560,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"14 2 1","pages":"921-931"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3180155.3180239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

The prevalence of design problems may cause re-engineering or even discontinuation of the system. Due to missing, informal or outdated design documentation, developers often have to rely on the source code to identify design problems. Therefore, developers have to analyze different symptoms that manifest in several code elements, which may quickly turn into a complex task. Although researchers have been investigating techniques to help developers in identifying design problems, there is little knowledge on how developers actually proceed to identify design problems. In order to tackle this problem, we conducted a multi-trial industrial experiment with professionals from 5 software companies to build a grounded theory. The resulting theory offers explanations on how developers identify design problems in practice. For instance, it reveals the characteristics of symptoms that developers consider helpful. Moreover, developers often combine different types of symptoms to identify a single design problem. This knowledge serves as a basis to further understand the phenomena and advance towards more effective identification techniques.
识别源代码中的设计问题:一个有根据的理论
设计问题的普遍存在可能导致系统的重新设计甚至终止。由于缺少、非正式或过时的设计文档,开发人员经常不得不依赖源代码来识别设计问题。因此,开发人员必须分析在几个代码元素中出现的不同症状,这可能很快就会变成一项复杂的任务。尽管研究人员一直在研究帮助开发人员识别设计问题的技术,但对于开发人员实际上如何识别设计问题却知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,我们与来自5家软件公司的专业人员进行了多试验工业实验,以建立一个接地气的理论。由此产生的理论解释了开发人员如何在实践中识别设计问题。例如,它揭示了开发人员认为有用的症状特征。此外,开发人员经常结合不同类型的症状来识别单个设计问题。这些知识是进一步理解这些现象和开发更有效的识别技术的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信