The comparative effects of local anaesthetics on wound healing in rats: Bupivacaine vs Levobupivacaine

Y. O. Atalay, T. Umuroğlu, Çağlayan Yağmur, F. Y. Gogus, S. Bozkurt
{"title":"The comparative effects of local anaesthetics on wound healing in rats: Bupivacaine vs Levobupivacaine","authors":"Y. O. Atalay, T. Umuroğlu, Çağlayan Yağmur, F. Y. Gogus, S. Bozkurt","doi":"10.5835/JECM.OMU.33.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of local anaesthetic agents (bupivacaine and levobupivacaine) on wound healing in rats. Wistar albino rats were randomly assigned to three groups (n=10 per group); the control group, the bupivacaine group, and the levobupivacaine group. An incision measuring 5 cm in length was made over the dorsum in all groups. The incisions were infiltrated with 3 ml of normal saline in the control group, 3 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in the bupivacaine group, and 3 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine in the levobupivacaine group. Histopathological examinations and tensile strength measurements were performed on tissue samples taken from the incision line 14 days after infiltration. Epidermal and dermal regeneration scores were significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine and control groupsm(p<0.05). Granulation tissue thickness, angiogenesis, and tensile strength measurements were not significantly different between groups. Even though incomplete epidermal and dermal regeneration scores were attained using levobupivacaine, both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine had no negative effects on the overall clinical wound-healing process.","PeriodicalId":15770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"157-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5835/JECM.OMU.33.02.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of local anaesthetic agents (bupivacaine and levobupivacaine) on wound healing in rats. Wistar albino rats were randomly assigned to three groups (n=10 per group); the control group, the bupivacaine group, and the levobupivacaine group. An incision measuring 5 cm in length was made over the dorsum in all groups. The incisions were infiltrated with 3 ml of normal saline in the control group, 3 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine in the bupivacaine group, and 3 ml of 0.25% levobupivacaine in the levobupivacaine group. Histopathological examinations and tensile strength measurements were performed on tissue samples taken from the incision line 14 days after infiltration. Epidermal and dermal regeneration scores were significantly lower in the levobupivacaine group compared with the bupivacaine and control groupsm(p<0.05). Granulation tissue thickness, angiogenesis, and tensile strength measurements were not significantly different between groups. Even though incomplete epidermal and dermal regeneration scores were attained using levobupivacaine, both bupivacaine and levobupivacaine had no negative effects on the overall clinical wound-healing process.
局部麻醉对大鼠伤口愈合的影响:布比卡因与左旋布比卡因
本研究旨在探讨局部麻醉剂(布比卡因和左旋布比卡因)对大鼠伤口愈合的影响。Wistar白化大鼠随机分为3组(每组n=10);对照组,布比卡因组,左旋布比卡因组。各组均在背侧做5 cm长的切口。对照组取生理盐水3 ml,布比卡因组取0.25%布比卡因3 ml,左旋布比卡因组取0.25%左旋布比卡因3 ml。浸润后14天取切口线组织标本进行组织病理学检查和抗拉强度测定。左旋布比卡因组表皮和真皮再生评分显著低于布比卡因组和对照组(p<0.05)。肉芽组织厚度、血管生成和抗拉强度测量在组间无显著差异。尽管使用左旋布比卡因获得了不完全表皮和真皮再生评分,但布比卡因和左旋布比卡因对整体临床伤口愈合过程没有负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信