Political Consumerism in Hong Kong: China’s Economic Intervention, Identity Politics, or Political Participation?

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Mathew Y. H. Wong, Ying-ho Kwong, E. Chan
{"title":"Political Consumerism in Hong Kong: China’s Economic Intervention, Identity Politics, or Political Participation?","authors":"Mathew Y. H. Wong, Ying-ho Kwong, E. Chan","doi":"10.4000/chinaperspectives.12330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the recent emergence of political consumerism in Hong Kong. Given its potential implications, we document the origin and maturation of this development and theoretically explain political consumerism from three perspectives: as a response to China’s economic intervention, as a form of identity politics, and as a new form of political participation. Drawing on original data collected from a representative survey of the local population, supplemented by interviews with stakeholders from the pro-democracy economic circle, we found that people who opposed China-Hong Kong economic integration and expressed a strong local (as opposed to national) identity tended to support boycotting. People who engaged in political consumerism were active in both legal and radical protests, pointing to the complementary nature of these different forms of activism. Further, by adopting a mediation analysis, we find that support towards the Anti-extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement only partially mediate the effect of the factors on political consumerism, suggesting that they are distinct development despite their shared origins. This article provides a novel perspective on the political polarisation in Hong Kong among consumer markets.","PeriodicalId":46173,"journal":{"name":"China Perspectives","volume":"18-19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.12330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This study examines the recent emergence of political consumerism in Hong Kong. Given its potential implications, we document the origin and maturation of this development and theoretically explain political consumerism from three perspectives: as a response to China’s economic intervention, as a form of identity politics, and as a new form of political participation. Drawing on original data collected from a representative survey of the local population, supplemented by interviews with stakeholders from the pro-democracy economic circle, we found that people who opposed China-Hong Kong economic integration and expressed a strong local (as opposed to national) identity tended to support boycotting. People who engaged in political consumerism were active in both legal and radical protests, pointing to the complementary nature of these different forms of activism. Further, by adopting a mediation analysis, we find that support towards the Anti-extradition Law Amendment Bill Movement only partially mediate the effect of the factors on political consumerism, suggesting that they are distinct development despite their shared origins. This article provides a novel perspective on the political polarisation in Hong Kong among consumer markets.
香港的政治消费主义:中国的经济干预、身份政治还是政治参与?
本研究探讨香港最近出现的政治消费主义。鉴于其潜在的影响,我们记录了这种发展的起源和成熟,并从三个角度从理论上解释了政治消费主义:作为对中国经济干预的回应,作为身份政治的一种形式,以及作为一种新的政治参与形式。根据从当地人口代表性调查中收集的原始数据,并辅以对亲民主经济圈利益相关者的采访,我们发现,反对中国-香港经济一体化并表达强烈的地方(而不是国家)认同的人倾向于支持抵制。参与政治消费主义的人在合法和激进的抗议活动中都很活跃,这表明这些不同形式的行动主义具有互补性。此外,通过中介分析,我们发现对《反引渡法修正案》运动的支持仅部分地中介了这些因素对政治消费主义的影响,这表明尽管它们有着共同的起源,但它们是不同的发展。这篇文章为香港消费市场的政治两极分化提供了一个新颖的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
China Perspectives
China Perspectives AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信