The criminality of abortion in Korea.

P. Hahm, B. Jon
{"title":"The criminality of abortion in Korea.","authors":"P. Hahm, B. Jon","doi":"10.2307/1140591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The wholesale importation of European laws into Korea, including the criminality of a woman undergoing an abortion, is called into question. In order to determine Korean attitudes among the professionals involved in the maintenance and prosecution of the law, a questionnaire was sent out to physicians, judges, public prosecutors, and practicing lawyers in Seoul and Pusan concerning their attitudes toward birth control and abortion, the criminality of abortion, and the influence of religion upo n abortion attitudes. An overwhelming 86.5% considered birth control \"very necessary.\" 78.6% though abortion was \"sometimes necessary,\" and 67.5% thought that \"many\" abortions were being performed in Korea. 81.4% felt that abortion was justifiable for certain causes. Chief among these were: ill health of the pregnant woman (90.1%), possible birth defect (87.6%), rape (62.8%), and single status of pregnant woman (32.2). Religious attitudes and profession tended to influence the reason's one considered abortion wrong. To have laws that are rarely enforced and are not supported by the people is considered bad morally as it tends to undermine faith in the legal system. Rescinding the law on criminal abortion or revising it to permit abortion on justifiable grounds is recommended.\n","PeriodicalId":85724,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","volume":"213 1","pages":"13-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of criminal law, criminology, and police science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1140591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The wholesale importation of European laws into Korea, including the criminality of a woman undergoing an abortion, is called into question. In order to determine Korean attitudes among the professionals involved in the maintenance and prosecution of the law, a questionnaire was sent out to physicians, judges, public prosecutors, and practicing lawyers in Seoul and Pusan concerning their attitudes toward birth control and abortion, the criminality of abortion, and the influence of religion upo n abortion attitudes. An overwhelming 86.5% considered birth control "very necessary." 78.6% though abortion was "sometimes necessary," and 67.5% thought that "many" abortions were being performed in Korea. 81.4% felt that abortion was justifiable for certain causes. Chief among these were: ill health of the pregnant woman (90.1%), possible birth defect (87.6%), rape (62.8%), and single status of pregnant woman (32.2). Religious attitudes and profession tended to influence the reason's one considered abortion wrong. To have laws that are rarely enforced and are not supported by the people is considered bad morally as it tends to undermine faith in the legal system. Rescinding the law on criminal abortion or revising it to permit abortion on justifiable grounds is recommended.
堕胎在韩国是犯罪行为。
包括妇女堕胎罪在内的欧洲法律大量输入韩国,也受到了质疑。为了确定韩国人对维护和执行法律的专业人员的态度,向汉城和釜山的医生、法官、检察官和执业律师发放了一份问卷,内容涉及他们对控制生育和堕胎的态度、堕胎的犯罪行为、宗教对堕胎态度的影响。86.5%的人认为节育“非常必要”。78.6%的人认为堕胎“有时是必要的”,67.5%的人认为韩国有“很多”堕胎,81.4%的人认为出于某些原因堕胎是合理的。其中最主要的是:孕妇健康状况不佳(90.1%)、可能的出生缺陷(87.6%)、强奸(62.8%)和孕妇单身(32.2%)。宗教态度和职业倾向于影响人们认为堕胎是错误的原因。很少执行且不受人民支持的法律被认为是不道德的,因为它往往会破坏人们对法律制度的信心。建议废除刑事堕胎法或修改法律,允许有正当理由的堕胎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信