Intralesional MMR versus intralesional bleomycin in the treatment of digital warts: A randomized comparative study and review of the literature

IF 0.1 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Arunima Ray, I. Agrawal, B. Kar
{"title":"Intralesional MMR versus intralesional bleomycin in the treatment of digital warts: A randomized comparative study and review of the literature","authors":"Arunima Ray, I. Agrawal, B. Kar","doi":"10.4103/tjd.tjd_10_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Warts are benign hyperkeratotic viral infections poorly responsive to most treatment modalities. Commonly used destructive methods can cause the scarring of the digits. Intralesional agents are preferred in digital warts. Individual efficacy has been assessed, but previously intralesional bleomycin and immunomodulator measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine have not been compared. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional MMR vaccine in the treatment of digital warts. Materials and Methods: All consenting adults with ≤5 digital warts were randomly divided into two groups by chit method: group A got intralesional MMR vaccine and group B got intralesional bleomycin monthly for 3 months with follow-up at the fourth month. Clearance and reduction in wart sizes and side effects were noted. Results: Totally 45 patients completed the study, and with single injection, clearance in group B was significantly higher than in group A (P = 0.001, Chi-square test). Necrosis, eschar formation, and residual pain were seen in group B. Overall, there was no significant difference in clearance rates at three injections (P = 0.198, chi-square test). Conclusion: Intralesional MMR vaccine and intralesional bleomycin are both effective in treating digital verrucae. Faster clearance is seen with intralesional bleomycin, with more side effects such as necrosis, eschar, and pain, controlled with oral analgesics.","PeriodicalId":42454,"journal":{"name":"Turk Dermatoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Dermatology","volume":"37 1","pages":"73 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Dermatoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjd.tjd_10_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Warts are benign hyperkeratotic viral infections poorly responsive to most treatment modalities. Commonly used destructive methods can cause the scarring of the digits. Intralesional agents are preferred in digital warts. Individual efficacy has been assessed, but previously intralesional bleomycin and immunomodulator measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine have not been compared. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and safety of intralesional bleomycin versus intralesional MMR vaccine in the treatment of digital warts. Materials and Methods: All consenting adults with ≤5 digital warts were randomly divided into two groups by chit method: group A got intralesional MMR vaccine and group B got intralesional bleomycin monthly for 3 months with follow-up at the fourth month. Clearance and reduction in wart sizes and side effects were noted. Results: Totally 45 patients completed the study, and with single injection, clearance in group B was significantly higher than in group A (P = 0.001, Chi-square test). Necrosis, eschar formation, and residual pain were seen in group B. Overall, there was no significant difference in clearance rates at three injections (P = 0.198, chi-square test). Conclusion: Intralesional MMR vaccine and intralesional bleomycin are both effective in treating digital verrucae. Faster clearance is seen with intralesional bleomycin, with more side effects such as necrosis, eschar, and pain, controlled with oral analgesics.
瘤内MMR与瘤内博来霉素治疗疣:一项随机比较研究和文献综述
简介:疣是良性角化性病毒感染,对大多数治疗方式反应较差。常用的破坏性方法会造成手指的疤痕。在数字疣中首选病灶内显像剂。已经对个体疗效进行了评估,但以前没有对病变内博莱霉素和免疫调节剂麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗进行比较。目的:评价局部注射博来霉素与局部注射MMR疫苗治疗尖锐湿疣的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:所有年龄≤5个疣的成人均同意,随机分为两组:A组接种瘤内MMR疫苗,B组每月接种瘤内博来霉素,为期3个月,第4个月随访。注意到清除和缩小疣大小和副作用。结果:共45例患者完成研究,单次注射B组清除率显著高于A组(P = 0.001,卡方检验)。b组出现坏死、结痂形成和残余疼痛。总体而言,三次注射的清除率无显著差异(P = 0.198,卡方检验)。结论:局部注射MMR疫苗和局部注射博来霉素治疗指疣均有较好的疗效。病灶内使用博来霉素清除更快,但副作用较多,如坏死、结痂和疼痛,口服镇痛药可控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信