Comparison of Peltier-Seebeck and Nernst-Ettingshausen energy converters in intermediate magnetic fields

H.J. Goldsmid, C.B. Thomas
{"title":"Comparison of Peltier-Seebeck and Nernst-Ettingshausen energy converters in intermediate magnetic fields","authors":"H.J. Goldsmid,&nbsp;C.B. Thomas","doi":"10.1016/0365-1789(67)90004-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Peltier-Seebeck and Nernst-Ettingshausen figures of merit have been calculated for a simple isotropic two-band model at intermediate magnetic field strengths. The results suggest that Peltier-Seebeck devices are likely to be more effective than Nernst-Ettingshausen devices. Furthermore, it appears that Peltier-Seebeck couples for use in a magnetic field may, with advantage, be composed solely of <em>n</em>-type materials. The active branch of each couple would then be lightly doped while the passive branch would be heavily doped. Criteria for the choice of materials are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100032,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Energy Conversion","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1967-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0365-1789(67)90004-5","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Energy Conversion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0365178967900045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Peltier-Seebeck and Nernst-Ettingshausen figures of merit have been calculated for a simple isotropic two-band model at intermediate magnetic field strengths. The results suggest that Peltier-Seebeck devices are likely to be more effective than Nernst-Ettingshausen devices. Furthermore, it appears that Peltier-Seebeck couples for use in a magnetic field may, with advantage, be composed solely of n-type materials. The active branch of each couple would then be lightly doped while the passive branch would be heavily doped. Criteria for the choice of materials are discussed.

中间磁场中Peltier-Seebeck和Nernst-Ettingshausen能量变换器的比较
对于一个简单的各向同性双波段模型,在中等磁场强度下计算了Peltier-Seebeck和Nernst-Ettingshausen的优值。结果表明,Peltier-Seebeck装置可能比Nernst-Ettingshausen装置更有效。此外,在磁场中使用的珀尔蒂埃-塞贝克偶极有可能完全由n型材料组成。然后,每对的有源分支将被轻掺杂,而无源分支将被重掺杂。讨论了材料选择的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信