Indonesian students’ religiousness, comfort, and anger toward God during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yonathan Aditya, I. Martoyo, Firmanto Adi Nurcahyo, Jessica Ariela, Yulmaida Amir, R. Pramono
{"title":"Indonesian students’ religiousness, comfort, and anger toward God during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Yonathan Aditya, I. Martoyo, Firmanto Adi Nurcahyo, Jessica Ariela, Yulmaida Amir, R. Pramono","doi":"10.1177/00846724221084917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the COVID-19 pandemic, many religious college students have found comfort in God, while others may have developed anger toward God; however, no studies have systematically compared the multidimensional effects of religiousness on how Muslim and Christian students react to stressors such as COVID-19. This study addressed this gap in the literature by investigating which of the Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale (4-BDRS: believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging) were significant predictors for both taking comfort in and feeling anger toward God among Muslim (n = 550) and Christian (n = 334) college students in Indonesia, while also controlling for the influence of neuroticism, a known predictor for attitudes toward God. Muslims reported that all dimensions of the 4-BDRS were significant predictors of comfort, with bonding as a negative predictor (β = –.09, p = .04), while Christians reported that belonging (β = .07, p = .34) was the only insignificant predictor. Muslims reported that believing (β = –.22, p ⩽ .001) and behaving (β = –.19, p = .002) were negative predictors of anger, while Christians reported negative effects only for bonding (β = –.17, p = .04); however, bonding did not significantly predict anger when analyzed separately for men and women. Therefore, to decrease their anger toward and increase the comfort they find in God, Muslims must focus on their beliefs and exercise the commandments of Islam. Christians, though, must focus on increasing cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects of religiousness to find comfort, while having better personal relationships with God could be key in reducing anger toward God.","PeriodicalId":44899,"journal":{"name":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for the Psychology of Religion-Archiv Fur Religionspsychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00846724221084917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many religious college students have found comfort in God, while others may have developed anger toward God; however, no studies have systematically compared the multidimensional effects of religiousness on how Muslim and Christian students react to stressors such as COVID-19. This study addressed this gap in the literature by investigating which of the Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale (4-BDRS: believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging) were significant predictors for both taking comfort in and feeling anger toward God among Muslim (n = 550) and Christian (n = 334) college students in Indonesia, while also controlling for the influence of neuroticism, a known predictor for attitudes toward God. Muslims reported that all dimensions of the 4-BDRS were significant predictors of comfort, with bonding as a negative predictor (β = –.09, p = .04), while Christians reported that belonging (β = .07, p = .34) was the only insignificant predictor. Muslims reported that believing (β = –.22, p ⩽ .001) and behaving (β = –.19, p = .002) were negative predictors of anger, while Christians reported negative effects only for bonding (β = –.17, p = .04); however, bonding did not significantly predict anger when analyzed separately for men and women. Therefore, to decrease their anger toward and increase the comfort they find in God, Muslims must focus on their beliefs and exercise the commandments of Islam. Christians, though, must focus on increasing cognitive, affective, and behavioral aspects of religiousness to find comfort, while having better personal relationships with God could be key in reducing anger toward God.
新冠疫情期间印尼学生的宗教信仰、安慰和对上帝的愤怒
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,许多宗教大学生在上帝身上找到了安慰,而其他人可能对上帝产生了愤怒;然而,没有研究系统地比较宗教信仰对穆斯林和基督教学生如何应对COVID-19等压力源的多维影响。本研究通过调查宗教信仰量表的四个基本维度(4-BDRS:信仰,结合,行为和归属)中哪一个是印度尼西亚穆斯林(n = 550)和基督徒(n = 334)大学生对上帝感到安慰和愤怒的重要预测因素,同时控制了神经质的影响,这是对上帝态度的已知预测因素,从而解决了文献中的这一空白。穆斯林报告说,4-BDRS的所有维度都是舒适度的显著预测因子,结合是一个负预测因子(β = -)。09, p = .04),而基督徒报告归属感(β = .04)。07, p = .34)是唯一不显著的预测因子。穆斯林报告说,相信(β = -。22, p < 0.001),表现(β = -。19, p = .002)是愤怒的负向预测因子,而基督教徒仅对亲密关系有负向影响(β = -)。17, p = .04);然而,当分别对男性和女性进行分析时,亲密关系并不能显著预测愤怒。因此,为了减少他们对真主的愤怒,增加他们从真主那里得到的安慰,穆斯林必须专注于他们的信仰,并遵守伊斯兰教的诫命。然而,基督徒必须专注于增加宗教的认知、情感和行为方面,以找到安慰,而与上帝建立更好的个人关系可能是减少对上帝愤怒的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The international, peer-reviewed journal Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is the oldest periodical that publishes research in the psychology of religion. It is the organ of the International Association for the Psychology of Religion (IAPR), founded in 1914. The Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv für Religionspsychologie is open to all scientific methodologies, both quantitative and qualitative.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信